CTXAF
Price
$16.30
Change
+$1.84 (+12.72%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.76B
PKIUF
Price
$27.96
Change
+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTXAF vs PKIUF

Header iconCTXAF vs PKIUF Comparison
Open Charts CTXAF vs PKIUFBanner chart's image
Ampol
Price$16.30
Change+$1.84 (+12.72%)
Volume$750
Capitalization4.76B
Parkland
Price$27.96
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$14.35K
Capitalization4.88B
CTXAF vs PKIUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PKIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXAF vs. PKIUF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXAF is a Hold and PKIUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXAF: $16.30 vs. PKIUF: $27.96)
Brand notoriety: CTXAF and PKIUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXAF: 100% vs. PKIUF: 531%
Market capitalization -- CTXAF: $4.76B vs. PKIUF: $4.88B
CTXAF [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $4.76B. PKIUF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $4.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $54.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $7.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePKIUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PKIUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PKIUF is a better buy in the long-term than CTXAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PKIUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PKIUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CTXAF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PKIUF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+1.05% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PKIUF($4.88B) and CTXAF($4.76B) have the same market capitalization . CTXAF has higher P/E ratio than PKIUF: CTXAF (49.29) vs PKIUF (22.82). PKIUF YTD gains are higher at: 23.881 vs. CTXAF (1.875). PKIUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.54B vs. CTXAF (657M). PKIUF has more cash in the bank: 439M vs. CTXAF (124M). CTXAF has less debt than PKIUF: CTXAF (4.08B) vs PKIUF (6.47B). CTXAF has higher revenues than PKIUF: CTXAF (34.9B) vs PKIUF (27.5B).
CTXAFPKIUFCTXAF / PKIUF
Capitalization4.76B4.88B98%
EBITDA657M1.54B43%
Gain YTD1.87523.8818%
P/E Ratio49.2922.82216%
Revenue34.9B27.5B127%
Total Cash124M439M28%
Total Debt4.08B6.47B63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXAF vs PKIUF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXAF
PKIUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7187
SMR RATING
1..100
9873
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
522
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PKIUF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTXAF (76). This means that PKIUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as PKIUF (87). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to PKIUF’s over the last 12 months.

PKIUF's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (98). This means that PKIUF’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

PKIUF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (60). This means that PKIUF’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as PKIUF (22). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to PKIUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXAFPKIUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PKIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIDU52.550.72
+1.39%
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X ETF
NAC11.380.13
+1.16%
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
GPTY43.950.11
+0.24%
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
DCRE52.060.09
+0.16%
DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF
ANEW50.49N/A
N/A
ProShares MSCI Trnsfmtnl Chngs ETF

CTXAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXAF and RBSFY have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXAF and RBSFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXAF
1D Price
Change %
CTXAF100%
N/A
RBSFY - CTXAF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTOIY - CTXAF
16%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
NTOIF - CTXAF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKIUF - CTXAF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
HEOL - CTXAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PKIUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PKIUF and RBSFY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PKIUF and RBSFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PKIUF
1D Price
Change %
PKIUF100%
+0.04%
RBSFY - PKIUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTXAF - PKIUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTOIY - PKIUF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
NTOIF - PKIUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEOL - PKIUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More