CTXAF
Price
$16.30
Change
+$1.84 (+12.72%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.55B
NTOIF
Price
$17.00
Change
-$0.62 (-3.52%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
13.17B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTXAF vs NTOIF

Header iconCTXAF vs NTOIF Comparison
Open Charts CTXAF vs NTOIFBanner chart's image
Ampol
Price$16.30
Change+$1.84 (+12.72%)
Volume$750
Capitalization4.55B
Neste OYJ
Price$17.00
Change-$0.62 (-3.52%)
Volume$1.12K
Capitalization13.17B
CTXAF vs NTOIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NTOIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXAF vs. NTOIF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXAF is a Hold and NTOIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXAF: $16.30 vs. NTOIF: $17.00)
Brand notoriety: CTXAF and NTOIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXAF: 100% vs. NTOIF: 47%
Market capitalization -- CTXAF: $4.55B vs. NTOIF: $13.17B
CTXAF [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $4.55B. NTOIF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $13.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $49.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $6.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTOIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NTOIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTOIF is a better buy in the long-term than CTXAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTOIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NTOIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CTXAF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NTOIF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+1.55% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTOIF($13.2B) has a higher market cap than CTXAF($4.55B). CTXAF has higher P/E ratio than NTOIF: CTXAF (49.29) vs NTOIF (20.00). NTOIF YTD gains are higher at: 41.667 vs. CTXAF (1.875). CTXAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 974M vs. NTOIF (-96M). NTOIF has more cash in the bank: 981M vs. CTXAF (124M). CTXAF has less debt than NTOIF: CTXAF (4.08B) vs NTOIF (5.34B). CTXAF has higher revenues than NTOIF: CTXAF (34.8B) vs NTOIF (20.7B).
CTXAFNTOIFCTXAF / NTOIF
Capitalization4.55B13.2B34%
EBITDA974M-96M-1,015%
Gain YTD1.87541.6674%
P/E Ratio49.2920.00246%
Revenue34.8B20.7B168%
Total Cash124M981M13%
Total Debt4.08B5.34B76%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXAF vs NTOIF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXAF
NTOIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4865
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
9792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
515
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTOIF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTXAF (76). This means that NTOIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as NTOIF (100). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to NTOIF’s over the last 12 months.

NTOIF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (97). This means that NTOIF’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

NTOIF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (60). This means that NTOIF’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as NTOIF (15). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to NTOIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXAFNTOIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
37%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTOIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STXI29.510.12
+0.41%
Strive International Developed Mkts ETF
NBH9.87-0.01
-0.10%
Neuberger Berman Municipal Fund
FEBP30.23-0.06
-0.19%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Feb
EUSA101.11-0.21
-0.21%
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
GLRY34.19-0.30
-0.87%
Inspire Momentum ETF

CTXAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXAF and RBSFY have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXAF and RBSFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXAF
1D Price
Change %
CTXAF100%
N/A
RBSFY - CTXAF
16%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
NTOIY - CTXAF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
NTOIF - CTXAF
14%
Poorly correlated
-3.52%
PKIUF - CTXAF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
HEOL - CTXAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NTOIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTOIF and CAPL have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTOIF and CAPL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTOIF
1D Price
Change %
NTOIF100%
-3.52%
CAPL - NTOIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
CTXAF - NTOIF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDKOF - NTOIF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDKOY - NTOIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JXHGF - NTOIF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More