Advertisement
CTVA vs MBCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTVA is a Hold and MBCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTVA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CTVA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTVA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CTVA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CTVA (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +3.03% price change this week, while MBCF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +6.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTVA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Agricultural (+0.78% weekly)The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| CTVA | MBCF | CTVA / MBCF | |
| Capitalization | 40.3B | 219M | 18,402% |
| EBITDA | 2.54B | 182M | 1,394% |
| Gain YTD | 30.916 | 59.338 | 52% |
| P/E Ratio | 44.37 | 1.98 | 2,238% |
| Revenue | 17.2B | 563M | 3,055% |
| Total Cash | 2.74B | 50.7M | 5,408% |
| Total Debt | 2.49B | 121M | 2,057% |
CTVA | MBCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MBCF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CTVA (77). This means that MBCF’s stock grew similarly to CTVA’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as MBCF (47). This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to MBCF’s over the last 12 months.
MBCF's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTVA (84). This means that MBCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTVA’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Price Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MBCF (37). This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to MBCF’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MBCF (100). This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to MBCF’s over the last 12 months.
| CTVA | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% |
Advertisement
CTVA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTVA has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTVA jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTVA | 100% | +2.43% | ||
| MOS - CTVA | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| IPI - CTVA | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| NTR - CTVA | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| FMC - CTVA | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| CF - CTVA | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||
MBCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MBCF and CTVA have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBCF and CTVA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBCF | 100% | +1.60% | ||
| CTVA - MBCF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| NTR - MBCF | 8% Poorly correlated | +4.05% | ||
| KPLUF - MBCF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BIOX - MBCF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.23% | ||
| ICL - MBCF | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||