CTVA
Price
$61.40
Change
+$0.40 (+0.66%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
41.7B
16 days until earnings call
ICL
Price
$6.28
Change
+$0.06 (+0.96%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.19B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTVA vs ICL

Header iconCTVA vs ICL Comparison
Open Charts CTVA vs ICLBanner chart's image
Corteva
Price$61.40
Change+$0.40 (+0.66%)
Volume$7.51M
Capitalization41.7B
ICL Group
Price$6.28
Change+$0.06 (+0.96%)
Volume$353.35K
Capitalization8.19B
CTVA vs ICL Comparison Chart in %
CTVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ICL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTVA vs. ICL commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTVA is a Hold and ICL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CTVA: $61.40 vs. ICL: $6.28)
Brand notoriety: CTVA and ICL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTVA: 161% vs. ICL: 55%
Market capitalization -- CTVA: $41.7B vs. ICL: $8.19B
CTVA [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $41.7B. ICL’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $8.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $41.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileICL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ICL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICL is a better buy in the long-term than CTVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ICL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ICL is a better buy in the short-term than CTVA.

Price Growth

CTVA (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while ICL (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTVA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

ICL is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+0.22% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTVA($41.7B) has a higher market cap than ICL($8.19B). CTVA has higher P/E ratio than ICL: CTVA (28.29) vs ICL (21.66). ICL YTD gains are higher at: 29.672 vs. CTVA (8.610). CTVA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.46B vs. ICL (1.39B). CTVA has more cash in the bank: 2.14B vs. ICL (701M). ICL has less debt than CTVA: ICL (2.92B) vs CTVA (3.63B). CTVA has higher revenues than ICL: CTVA (17.2B) vs ICL (6.95B).
CTVAICLCTVA / ICL
Capitalization41.7B8.19B509%
EBITDA3.46B1.39B249%
Gain YTD8.61029.67229%
P/E Ratio28.2921.66131%
Revenue17.2B6.95B247%
Total Cash2.14B701M305%
Total Debt3.63B2.92B124%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTVA vs ICL: Fundamental Ratings
CTVA
ICL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6765
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3065
SMR RATING
1..100
8482
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9110
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICL's Valuation (29) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTVA (64) in the null industry. This means that ICL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTVA’s over the last 12 months.

CTVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICL (65) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICL’s over the last 12 months.

ICL's SMR Rating (82) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CTVA (84) in the null industry. This means that ICL’s stock grew similarly to CTVA’s over the last 12 months.

ICL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CTVA (63) in the null industry. This means that ICL’s stock grew similarly to CTVA’s over the last 12 months.

ICL's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTVA (91) in the null industry. This means that ICL’s stock grew significantly faster than CTVA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTVAICL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ICL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKLC127.610.67
+0.53%
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
EWJV38.960.08
+0.21%
iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF
CXE3.68N/A
N/A
MFS High Income Municipal Trust
MVPL35.96N/A
N/A
Miller Value Ptnrs Leverage ETF
SPTB30.84-0.03
-0.11%
SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF

CTVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTVA has been loosely correlated with FMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTVA jumps, then FMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTVA
1D Price
Change %
CTVA100%
+0.66%
FMC - CTVA
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
MOS - CTVA
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
NTR - CTVA
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
ICL - CTVA
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
CF - CTVA
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
More

ICL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICL has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICL jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICL
1D Price
Change %
ICL100%
+0.96%
MOS - ICL
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
NTR - ICL
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
CTVA - ICL
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
CF - ICL
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
KPLUY - ICL
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
More