Advertisement
CTVA vs ICL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTVA is a Hold and ICL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileICL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CTVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ICL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ICL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CTVA (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +0.51% price change this week, while ICL (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -0.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTVA is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.
ICL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Agricultural (+2.77% weekly)The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| CTVA | ICL | CTVA / ICL | |
| Capitalization | 47.6B | 7.09B | 671% |
| EBITDA | 3.7B | 1.42B | 261% |
| Gain YTD | 5.177 | -3.152 | -164% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.54 | 19.07 | 150% |
| Revenue | 17.5B | 7.05B | 248% |
| Total Cash | 2.59B | 476M | 543% |
| Total Debt | 4.37B | 2.68B | 163% |
CTVA | ICL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ICL's Valuation (25) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTVA (61) in the null industry. This means that ICL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTVA’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICL (81) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICL’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as ICL (82) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to ICL’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as ICL (60) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to ICL’s over the last 12 months.
ICL's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTVA (96) in the null industry. This means that ICL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTVA’s over the last 12 months.
| CTVA | ICL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 10 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NINCX | 24.26 | 0.32 | +1.34% |
| Neuberger Intrinsic Value C | |||
| DTGRX | 72.54 | 0.46 | +0.64% |
| BNY Mellon Technology Growth A | |||
| RFNGX | 95.35 | 0.50 | +0.53% |
| American Funds Fundamental Invs R6 | |||
| GQIRX | 55.12 | 0.27 | +0.49% |
| Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq Inv | |||
| BRSIX | 16.38 | 0.06 | +0.37% |
| Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company Market | |||
CTVA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTVA has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTVA jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTVA | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| MOS - CTVA | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| IPI - CTVA | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| CF - CTVA | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| NTR - CTVA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| UAN - CTVA | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.48% | ||
More | ||||
ICL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICL has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICL jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICL | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| MOS - ICL | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| CTVA - ICL | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| CF - ICL | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| NTR - ICL | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.46% | ||
| KPLUY - ICL | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
More | ||||