CTUNF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.03 (+60.00%)
Updated
Mar 31 closing price
Capitalization
54.56M
MHGVY
Price
$19.46
Change
-$0.33 (-1.67%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.17B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTUNF vs MHGVY

Header iconCTUNF vs MHGVY Comparison
Open Charts CTUNF vs MHGVYBanner chart's image
Clean Seas Seafood
Price$0.08
Change+$0.03 (+60.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization54.56M
Mowi ASA
Price$19.46
Change-$0.33 (-1.67%)
Volume$13.95K
Capitalization9.17B
CTUNF vs MHGVY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MHGVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTUNF vs. MHGVY commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTUNF is a Hold and MHGVY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CTUNF: $0.08 vs. MHGVY: $19.46)
Brand notoriety: CTUNF and MHGVY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTUNF: 100% vs. MHGVY: 96%
Market capitalization -- CTUNF: $54.56M vs. MHGVY: $9.17B
CTUNF [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $54.56M. MHGVY’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $9.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTUNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMHGVY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTUNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MHGVY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MHGVY is a better buy in the long-term than CTUNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MHGVY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MHGVY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CTUNF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MHGVY (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was +2.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

MHGVY is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (-0.56% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MHGVY($9.17B) has a higher market cap than CTUNF($54.6M). CTUNF (10.08) and MHGVY (9.73) have similar P/E ratio . CTUNF YTD gains are higher at: 60.000 vs. MHGVY (18.294). MHGVY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.55B vs. CTUNF (11.4M). MHGVY has more cash in the bank: 119M vs. CTUNF (30.1M). CTUNF has less debt than MHGVY: CTUNF (23M) vs MHGVY (2.19B). MHGVY has higher revenues than CTUNF: MHGVY (5.17B) vs CTUNF (69.2M).
CTUNFMHGVYCTUNF / MHGVY
Capitalization54.6M9.17B1%
EBITDA11.4M1.55B1%
Gain YTD60.00018.294328%
P/E Ratio10.089.73104%
Revenue69.2M5.17B1%
Total Cash30.1M119M25%
Total Debt23M2.19B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTUNF vs MHGVY: Fundamental Ratings
CTUNF
MHGVY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
9874
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2441
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MHGVY's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTUNF (68). This means that MHGVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTUNF’s over the last 12 months.

MHGVY's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as CTUNF (100). This means that MHGVY’s stock grew similarly to CTUNF’s over the last 12 months.

MHGVY's SMR Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as CTUNF (98). This means that MHGVY’s stock grew similarly to CTUNF’s over the last 12 months.

MHGVY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CTUNF (54). This means that MHGVY’s stock grew similarly to CTUNF’s over the last 12 months.

CTUNF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as MHGVY (41). This means that CTUNF’s stock grew similarly to MHGVY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTUNFMHGVY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MHGVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OVTZ0.04N/A
+1.30%
OCULUS INC.
JAPAF29.24N/A
N/A
Japan Tobacco
JNPKF22.35N/A
N/A
Jenoptik AG
TSMCF0.09N/A
N/A
TESMEC S P A
NBGIF14.28-0.34
-2.36%
National Bank of Greece S.A.

CTUNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTUNF and AGRI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTUNF and AGRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTUNF
1D Price
Change %
CTUNF100%
N/A
AGRI - CTUNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+10.82%
MHGVY - CTUNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
HERB - CTUNF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDESY - CTUNF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSFD - CTUNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MHGVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MHGVY and ADM have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHGVY and ADM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHGVY
1D Price
Change %
MHGVY100%
-1.67%
ADM - MHGVY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
DOLE - MHGVY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
AFRI - MHGVY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
ALCO - MHGVY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
CTUNF - MHGVY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More