CTTAY
Price
$6.66
Change
-$0.10 (-1.48%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
13.31B
41 days until earnings call
LIMAF
Price
$53.50
Change
-$2.13 (-3.83%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTTAY vs LIMAF

Header iconCTTAY vs LIMAF Comparison
Open Charts CTTAY vs LIMAFBanner chart's image
Continental AG
Price$6.66
Change-$0.10 (-1.48%)
Volume$52.15K
Capitalization13.31B
Linamar
Price$53.50
Change-$2.13 (-3.83%)
Volume$1.69K
Capitalization3.24B
CTTAY vs LIMAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTTAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTTAY vs. LIMAF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTAY is a Hold and LIMAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CTTAY: $6.66 vs. LIMAF: $53.50)
Brand notoriety: CTTAY and LIMAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTTAY: 93% vs. LIMAF: 16%
Market capitalization -- CTTAY: $13.31B vs. LIMAF: $3.24B
CTTAY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $13.31B. LIMAF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTTAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIMAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTTAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIMAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIMAF is a better buy in the long-term than CTTAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTTAY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIMAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTTAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LIMAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIMAF is a better buy in the short-term than CTTAY.

Price Growth

CTTAY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -1.03% price change this week, while LIMAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -3.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTTAY is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.66% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTTAY($13.3B) has a higher market cap than LIMAF($3.24B). LIMAF has higher P/E ratio than CTTAY: LIMAF (20.98) vs CTTAY (10.12). CTTAY (36.926) and LIMAF (35.443) have similar YTD gains .
CTTAYLIMAFCTTAY / LIMAF
Capitalization13.3B3.24B410%
EBITDAN/A1.16B-
Gain YTD36.92635.443104%
P/E Ratio10.1220.9848%
RevenueN/A10.2B-
Total CashN/A1B-
Total DebtN/A2.21B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTTAY vs LIMAF: Fundamental Ratings
CTTAY
LIMAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
286
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9263
SMR RATING
1..100
5387
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
785
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTTAY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as LIMAF (33). This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to LIMAF’s over the last 12 months.

LIMAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAY (92). This means that LIMAF’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIMAF (87). This means that CTTAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIMAF’s over the last 12 months.

LIMAF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAY (47). This means that LIMAF’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

LIMAF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTTAY (78). This means that LIMAF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTTAYLIMAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTTAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSML75.540.69
+0.92%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Gr Alpha ETF
MFSG27.840.07
+0.27%
MFS Active Growth ETF
FUSI50.75N/A
-0.01%
American Century Multisector Flt Inc ETF
FMAY51.93-0.07
-0.13%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF May
CADNZD1.24-0.00
-0.28%
Canadian Dollar - New Zealand Dollar

CTTAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAY
1D Price
Change %
CTTAY100%
-1.48%
VLEEY - CTTAY
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
CTTAF - CTTAY
61%
Loosely correlated
-5.24%
PASTF - CTTAY
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MGDDY - CTTAY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
BRDCY - CTTAY
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More

LIMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIMAF has been loosely correlated with KNRRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIMAF jumps, then KNRRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIMAF
1D Price
Change %
LIMAF100%
N/A
KNRRY - LIMAF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VLEEY - LIMAF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTTAY - LIMAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NKRKY - LIMAF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNZOY - LIMAF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More