CTTAY
Price
$9.07
Change
+$0.10 (+1.11%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
16.01B
9 days until earnings call
LIMAF
Price
$50.03
Change
-$0.37 (-0.73%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTTAY vs LIMAF

Header iconCTTAY vs LIMAF Comparison
Open Charts CTTAY vs LIMAFBanner chart's image
Continental AG
Price$9.07
Change+$0.10 (+1.11%)
Volume$47.19K
Capitalization16.01B
Linamar
Price$50.03
Change-$0.37 (-0.73%)
Volume$9.27K
Capitalization3.55B
CTTAY vs LIMAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTTAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTTAY vs. LIMAF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTAY is a Hold and LIMAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CTTAY: $9.07 vs. LIMAF: $50.03)
Brand notoriety: CTTAY and LIMAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTTAY: 153% vs. LIMAF: 111%
Market capitalization -- CTTAY: $16.01B vs. LIMAF: $3.55B
CTTAY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $16.01B. LIMAF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTTAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIMAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTTAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIMAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIMAF is a better buy in the long-term than CTTAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTTAY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIMAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTTAY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LIMAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIMAF is a better buy in the short-term than CTTAY.

Price Growth

CTTAY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.01% price change this week, while LIMAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTTAY is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.71% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTTAY($16B) has a higher market cap than LIMAF($3.55B). CTTAY has higher P/E ratio than LIMAF: CTTAY (69.93) vs LIMAF (10.99). CTTAY YTD gains are higher at: 42.319 vs. LIMAF (26.658). CTTAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.19B vs. LIMAF (1.09B). CTTAY has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. LIMAF (891M). LIMAF has less debt than CTTAY: LIMAF (1.37B) vs CTTAY (8.01B). CTTAY has higher revenues than LIMAF: CTTAY (40.4B) vs LIMAF (8.43B).
CTTAYLIMAFCTTAY / LIMAF
Capitalization16B3.55B450%
EBITDA4.19B1.09B385%
Gain YTD42.31926.658159%
P/E Ratio69.9310.99636%
Revenue40.4B8.43B479%
Total Cash2.38B891M267%
Total Debt8.01B1.37B587%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTTAY vs LIMAF: Fundamental Ratings
CTTAY
LIMAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8062
SMR RATING
1..100
7284
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
769
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTTAY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as LIMAF (28). This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to LIMAF’s over the last 12 months.

LIMAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAY (80). This means that LIMAF’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as LIMAF (84). This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to LIMAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LIMAF (44). This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to LIMAF’s over the last 12 months.

LIMAF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTTAY (76). This means that LIMAF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTTAYLIMAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTTAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNYNZD0.230.00
+0.24%
China Yuan - New Zealand Dollar
TRND32.470.07
+0.22%
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
OCTW37.530.04
+0.10%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer20 Oct ETF
CADGBP0.54N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - United Kingdom Pound
SMIN75.08-0.67
-0.88%
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF

CTTAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAY
1D Price
Change %
CTTAY100%
+1.11%
VLEEY - CTTAY
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
CTTAF - CTTAY
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
PASTF - CTTAY
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MGDDY - CTTAY
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.97%
BRDCY - CTTAY
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
More

LIMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIMAF has been loosely correlated with KNRRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIMAF jumps, then KNRRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIMAF
1D Price
Change %
LIMAF100%
-0.74%
KNRRY - LIMAF
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
VLEEY - LIMAF
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
CTTAY - LIMAF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
NKRKY - LIMAF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNZOY - LIMAF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.31%
More