CTTAF
Price
$65.14
Change
-$3.60 (-5.24%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
13.31B
VLEEY
Price
$6.27
Change
-$0.08 (-1.26%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.15B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTTAF vs VLEEY

Header iconCTTAF vs VLEEY Comparison
Open Charts CTTAF vs VLEEYBanner chart's image
Continental AG
Price$65.14
Change-$3.60 (-5.24%)
Volume$43
Capitalization13.31B
Valeo SE
Price$6.27
Change-$0.08 (-1.26%)
Volume$468
Capitalization3.15B
CTTAF vs VLEEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLEEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTTAF vs. VLEEY commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTAF is a Hold and VLEEY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CTTAF: $65.14 vs. VLEEY: $6.27)
Brand notoriety: CTTAF and VLEEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTTAF: 7% vs. VLEEY: 8%
Market capitalization -- CTTAF: $13.31B vs. VLEEY: $3.15B
CTTAF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $13.31B. VLEEY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTTAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVLEEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VLEEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLEEY is a better buy in the long-term than CTTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTTAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLEEY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTTAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VLEEY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTTAF is a better buy in the short-term than VLEEY.

Price Growth

CTTAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -5.10% price change this week, while VLEEY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

VLEEY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.66% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTTAF($13.3B) has a higher market cap than VLEEY($3.15B). VLEEY has higher P/E ratio than CTTAF: VLEEY (21.23) vs CTTAF (9.90). VLEEY YTD gains are higher at: 45.652 vs. CTTAF (24.693).
CTTAFVLEEYCTTAF / VLEEY
Capitalization13.3B3.15B422%
EBITDAN/A2.72B-
Gain YTD24.69345.65254%
P/E Ratio9.9021.2347%
RevenueN/A21B-
Total CashN/A2.42B-
Total DebtN/A6.59B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTTAF vs VLEEY: Fundamental Ratings
CTTAF
VLEEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1816
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
788
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLEEY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAF (25). This means that VLEEY’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

VLEEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAF (100). This means that VLEEY’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLEEY (97). This means that CTTAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLEEY’s over the last 12 months.

VLEEY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAF (46). This means that VLEEY’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

VLEEY's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTTAF (78). This means that VLEEY’s stock grew significantly faster than CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTTAFVLEEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLEEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USDEUR0.85N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Euro
CHFGBP0.94N/A
N/A
Switzerland Franc - United Kingdom Pound
EURNZD2.02N/A
N/A
Euro - New Zealand Dollar
HKDNZD0.22N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - New Zealand Dollar
IMCGX11.14-0.08
-0.71%
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth I

CTTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAF has been loosely correlated with CTTAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAF jumps, then CTTAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAF
1D Price
Change %
CTTAF100%
-5.24%
CTTAY - CTTAF
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
VLEEY - CTTAF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
PASTF - CTTAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNZOF - CTTAF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
MGDDY - CTTAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More

VLEEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VLEEY has been loosely correlated with CTTAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VLEEY jumps, then CTTAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLEEY
1D Price
Change %
VLEEY100%
-1.26%
CTTAY - VLEEY
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
MGDDY - VLEEY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
CTTAF - VLEEY
41%
Loosely correlated
-5.24%
FURCF - VLEEY
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KNRRY - VLEEY
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
More