Advertisement
CTTAF vs LEA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTAF is a Hold and LEA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTTAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLEA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CTTAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTTAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTTAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LEA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CTTAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.01% price change this week, while LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
LEA is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.16% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| CTTAF | LEA | CTTAF / LEA | |
| Capitalization | 15B | 5.59B | 268% |
| EBITDA | 4.38B | 1.26B | 346% |
| Gain YTD | 40.734 | 18.513 | 220% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.07 | 13.14 | 92% |
| Revenue | 39.6B | 17.3B | 229% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 888M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 2.79B | - |
CTTAF | LEA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LEA's Valuation (21) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAF (69) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.
LEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAF (100) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.
CTTAF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (77) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAF’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.
CTTAF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (45) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAF’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.
LEA's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAF (66) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.
| CTTAF | LEA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 25 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OGMYX | 54.80 | 1.67 | +3.14% |
| Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Y | |||
| VDADX | 59.71 | 0.34 | +0.57% |
| Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Adm | |||
| ABWAX | 17.21 | 0.03 | +0.17% |
| AB All Market Total Return A | |||
| GAAHX | 21.90 | -0.14 | -0.64% |
| GMO Resources R6 | |||
| BLRYX | 12.07 | -0.08 | -0.66% |
| Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate I | |||
CTTAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAF has been loosely correlated with CTTAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAF jumps, then CTTAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTTAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTTAF | 100% | -2.68% | ||
| CTTAY - CTTAF | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| VLEEY - CTTAF | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.40% | ||
| MGA - CTTAF | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
| VC - CTTAF | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| LEA - CTTAF | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
More | ||||
LEA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with MGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then MGA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEA | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| MGA - LEA | 78% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| VC - LEA | 77% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| APTV - LEA | 76% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| BWA - LEA | 75% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| THRM - LEA | 72% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
More | ||||