CTTAF
Price
$83.98
Change
-$2.46 (-2.85%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.98B
DNZOF
Price
$14.38
Change
-$0.68 (-4.51%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
40.21B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTTAF vs DNZOF

Header iconCTTAF vs DNZOF Comparison
Open Charts CTTAF vs DNZOFBanner chart's image
Continental AG
Price$83.98
Change-$2.46 (-2.85%)
Volume$26
Capitalization16.98B
Denso
Price$14.38
Change-$0.68 (-4.51%)
Volume$5.44K
Capitalization40.21B
CTTAF vs DNZOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTTAF vs. DNZOF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTAF is a Hold and DNZOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CTTAF: $83.98 vs. DNZOF: $14.39)
Brand notoriety: CTTAF and DNZOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTTAF: 8% vs. DNZOF: 194%
Market capitalization -- CTTAF: $16.98B vs. DNZOF: $40.21B
CTTAF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $16.98B. DNZOF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $40.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTTAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDNZOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DNZOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNZOF is a better buy in the long-term than CTTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTTAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNZOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTTAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DNZOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DNZOF is a better buy in the short-term than CTTAF.

Price Growth

CTTAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.60% price change this week, while DNZOF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.40% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNZOF($40.2B) has a higher market cap than CTTAF($17B). DNZOF has higher P/E ratio than CTTAF: DNZOF (14.68) vs CTTAF (12.93). CTTAF YTD gains are higher at: 22.997 vs. DNZOF (-2.804). DNZOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 980B vs. CTTAF (4.38B). DNZOF has more cash in the bank: 1.1T vs. CTTAF (2.06B). CTTAF has less debt than DNZOF: CTTAF (8.52B) vs DNZOF (699B). DNZOF has higher revenues than CTTAF: DNZOF (7.16T) vs CTTAF (39.6B).
CTTAFDNZOFCTTAF / DNZOF
Capitalization17B40.2B42%
EBITDA4.38B980B0%
Gain YTD22.997-2.804-820%
P/E Ratio12.9314.6888%
Revenue39.6B7.16T1%
Total Cash2.06B1.1T0%
Total Debt8.52B699B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTTAF vs DNZOF: Fundamental Ratings
CTTAF
DNZOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
531
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6683
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTTAF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as DNZOF (25). This means that CTTAF’s stock grew similarly to DNZOF’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAF (100). This means that DNZOF’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAF (53). This means that DNZOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as DNZOF (58). This means that CTTAF’s stock grew similarly to DNZOF’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAF's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as DNZOF (83). This means that CTTAF’s stock grew similarly to DNZOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTTAFDNZOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYBN6.730.75
+12.54%
Cybin Inc
USLM123.062.07
+1.71%
United States Lime & Minerals
IRM92.181.10
+1.21%
Iron Mountain
NCL0.15N/A
-0.67%
Northann Corp
HRTG24.09-0.38
-1.55%
Heritage Insurance Holdings

CTTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAF has been loosely correlated with CTTAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAF jumps, then CTTAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAF
1D Price
Change %
CTTAF100%
-2.85%
CTTAY - CTTAF
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
VLEEY - CTTAF
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
PASTF - CTTAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNZOF - CTTAF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
MGDDY - CTTAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More

DNZOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNZOF and CTTAF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNZOF and CTTAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNZOF
1D Price
Change %
DNZOF100%
-4.55%
CTTAF - DNZOF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.85%
DNZOY - DNZOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
EXCOF - DNZOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
CMMCF - DNZOF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRDCY - DNZOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
More