Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTSOX vs NRGSX
CTSOX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CTSOX vs NRGSX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth R6
Price$48.53
Change+$0.52 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets634.57M
CTSOX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTSOX vs. NRGSX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTSOX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.61B vs. CTSOX (635M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CTSOX: NRGSX (0.50) vs CTSOX (0.00). CTSOX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CTSOX (7 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CTSOX (1.00) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CTSOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). CTSOX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTSOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.09 vs. NRGSX (-11.92). CTSOX return over 5 years is better than : 25.99 vs. NRGSX (-20.23).
| CTSOX | NRGSX | CTSOX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.74 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.74 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.890 | 7.927 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 635M | 8.61B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.09 | -11.92 | -202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.04 | 1.59 | 5,962% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.99 | -20.23 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers