CTS
Price
$41.43
Change
-$0.57 (-1.36%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.22B
88 days until earnings call
SANM
Price
$98.58
Change
+$2.79 (+2.91%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.27B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTS vs SANM

Header iconCTS vs SANM Comparison
Open Charts CTS vs SANMBanner chart's image
CTS
Price$41.43
Change-$0.57 (-1.36%)
Volume$367.11K
Capitalization1.22B
Sanmina
Price$98.58
Change+$2.79 (+2.91%)
Volume$792.4K
Capitalization5.27B
CTS vs SANM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTS vs. SANM commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTS is a Hold and SANM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CTS: $41.43 vs. SANM: $98.58)
Brand notoriety: CTS and SANM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTS: 182% vs. SANM: 154%
Market capitalization -- CTS: $1.22B vs. SANM: $5.27B
CTS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $1.22B. SANM’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $5.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $127.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSANM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SANM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SANM is a better buy in the long-term than CTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SANM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SANM is a better buy in the short-term than CTS.

Price Growth

CTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -1.15% price change this week, while SANM (@Electronic Components) price change was -2.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

SANM is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.74% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SANM($5.27B) has a higher market cap than CTS($1.22B). SANM has higher P/E ratio than CTS: SANM (22.82) vs CTS (19.64). SANM YTD gains are higher at: 30.276 vs. CTS (-21.284). CTS has less debt than SANM: CTS (112M) vs SANM (309M).
CTSSANMCTS / SANM
Capitalization1.22B5.27B23%
EBITDAN/A480M-
Gain YTD-21.28430.276-70%
P/E Ratio19.6422.8286%
RevenueN/A7.85B-
Total CashN/A647M-
Total Debt112M309M36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTS vs SANM: Fundamental Ratings
CTS
SANM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
458
SMR RATING
1..100
6465
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9023
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5017

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTS's Valuation (39) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SANM (56). This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to SANM’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTS (45). This means that SANM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTS’s over the last 12 months.

CTS's SMR Rating (64) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SANM (65). This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to SANM’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CTS (62). This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTS (90). This means that SANM’s stock grew significantly faster than CTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTSSANM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTIGX15.350.19
+1.25%
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth I
ACFGX80.910.46
+0.57%
American Century Focused Dynamic Gr G
JABFX12.22N/A
N/A
JHancock Real Estate Securities C
SVAIX6.36N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Div IS
PNRCX43.79-0.23
-0.52%
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources C

CTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTS has been closely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTS
1D Price
Change %
CTS100%
-1.36%
KN - CTS
79%
Closely correlated
+9.27%
BHE - CTS
73%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
LFUS - CTS
72%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
ROG - CTS
71%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
SANM - CTS
70%
Closely correlated
+2.91%
More

SANM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SANM has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SANM jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANM
1D Price
Change %
SANM100%
+2.91%
FLEX - SANM
77%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
BHE - SANM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
PLXS - SANM
75%
Closely correlated
+4.19%
JBL - SANM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
KN - SANM
73%
Closely correlated
+9.27%
More