CTS
Price
$40.97
Change
-$0.58 (-1.40%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.21B
66 days until earnings call
REFR
Price
$1.47
Change
-$0.05 (-3.29%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
49.46M
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTS vs REFR

Header iconCTS vs REFR Comparison
Open Charts CTS vs REFRBanner chart's image
CTS
Price$40.97
Change-$0.58 (-1.40%)
Volume$117.25K
Capitalization1.21B
Research Frontiers
Price$1.47
Change-$0.05 (-3.29%)
Volume$28.37K
Capitalization49.46M
CTS vs REFR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
REFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTS vs. REFR commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTS is a Hold and REFR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CTS: $40.97 vs. REFR: $1.47)
Brand notoriety: CTS and REFR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTS: 53% vs. REFR: 86%
Market capitalization -- CTS: $1.21B vs. REFR: $49.46M
CTS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $1.21B. REFR’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $49.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $133.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileREFR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • REFR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTS is a better buy in the long-term than REFR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REFR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • REFR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTS is a better buy in the short-term than REFR.

Price Growth

CTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +4.57% price change this week, while REFR (@Electronic Components) price change was -3.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

REFR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+2.55% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTS($1.21B) has a higher market cap than REFR($49.5M). REFR YTD gains are higher at: -14.035 vs. CTS (-22.158). CTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 117M vs. REFR (-944.01K). CTS has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. REFR (1.35M). REFR has less debt than CTS: REFR (1.27M) vs CTS (113M). CTS has higher revenues than REFR: CTS (521M) vs REFR (1.58M).
CTSREFRCTS / REFR
Capitalization1.21B49.5M2,440%
EBITDA117M-944.01K-12,394%
Gain YTD-22.158-14.035158%
P/E Ratio19.42N/A-
Revenue521M1.58M32,933%
Total Cash99.4M1.35M7,347%
Total Debt113M1.27M8,933%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTS vs REFR: Fundamental Ratings
CTS
REFR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1769
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47100
SMR RATING
1..100
6397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6063
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTS's Valuation (26) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for REFR (75) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than REFR’s over the last 12 months.

CTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for REFR (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than REFR’s over the last 12 months.

CTS's SMR Rating (63) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for REFR (97) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than REFR’s over the last 12 months.

CTS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as REFR (63) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to REFR’s over the last 12 months.

CTS's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as REFR (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to REFR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTSREFR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
REFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEPTF0.87N/A
N/A
Beach Energy Ltd.
PBNC50.01N/A
N/A
PB Financial Corporation
MNLCF15.22N/A
N/A
Manulife Financial Corp.
SQNXF77.30-0.90
-1.15%
Square Enix Co., Ltd.
RMHI0.70-0.08
-10.26%
Retrieve Medical Holdings Inc

CTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTS has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTS jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTS
1D Price
Change %
CTS100%
-1.40%
BHE - CTS
77%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
KN - CTS
76%
Closely correlated
-1.69%
LFUS - CTS
68%
Closely correlated
-2.22%
PLXS - CTS
68%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
TEL - CTS
67%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
More

REFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that REFR and DAIO have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that REFR and DAIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REFR
1D Price
Change %
REFR100%
-3.29%
DAIO - REFR
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
ALNT - REFR
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
TTMI - REFR
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
LPTH - REFR
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
CTS - REFR
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
More