CTS
Price
$53.28
Change
+$14.97 (+39.08%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.55B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KN
Price
$24.59
Change
+$1.12 (+4.77%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.09B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTS vs KN

Header iconCTS vs KN Comparison
Open Charts CTS vs KNBanner chart's image
CTS
Price$53.28
Change+$14.97 (+39.08%)
Volume$172.25K
Capitalization1.55B
KNOWLES
Price$24.59
Change+$1.12 (+4.77%)
Volume$1.06M
Capitalization2.09B
CTS vs KN Comparison Chart in %
CTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTS vs. KN commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTS is a StrongBuy and KN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CTS: $53.28 vs. KN: $24.59)
Brand notoriety: CTS and KN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTS: 94% vs. KN: 149%
Market capitalization -- CTS: $1.55B vs. KN: $2.09B
CTS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $1.55B. KN’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $2.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $180.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $9.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTS is a better buy in the long-term than KN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KN is a better buy in the short-term than CTS.

Price Growth

CTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +4.33% price change this week, while KN (@Electronic Components) price change was +1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTS is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

KN is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-1.35% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KN($2.09B) has a higher market cap than CTS($1.55B). KN has higher P/E ratio than CTS: KN (61.48) vs CTS (26.91). CTS YTD gains are higher at: 24.283 vs. KN (14.746). CTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 116M vs. KN (99.5M). CTS has less debt than KN: CTS (117M) vs KN (197M). KN has higher revenues than CTS: KN (574M) vs CTS (532M).
CTSKNCTS / KN
Capitalization1.55B2.09B74%
EBITDA116M99.5M117%
Gain YTD24.28314.746165%
P/E Ratio26.9161.4844%
Revenue532M574M93%
Total CashN/A92.5M-
Total Debt117M197M59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTS vs KN: Fundamental Ratings
CTS
KN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5869
SMR RATING
1..100
6683
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4512
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTS's Valuation (28) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KN (71). This means that CTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than KN’s over the last 12 months.

CTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as KN (69). This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to KN’s over the last 12 months.

CTS's SMR Rating (66) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as KN (83). This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to KN’s over the last 12 months.

CTS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as KN (43). This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to KN’s over the last 12 months.

KN's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTS (45). This means that KN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTSKN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STFBX98.09N/A
N/A
State Farm Balanced
RSMOX24.42-0.10
-0.41%
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth A
PGLEX20.59-0.15
-0.72%
Putnam Focused International Equity R6
ODMCX9.89-0.08
-0.80%
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity C
VAFCX21.27-0.37
-1.71%
Invesco American Franchise C

CTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTS has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTS jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTS
1D Price
Change %
CTS100%
+0.30%
BHE - CTS
76%
Closely correlated
+3.97%
KN - CTS
75%
Closely correlated
-2.19%
LFUS - CTS
67%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
PLXS - CTS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
TEL - CTS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
More

KN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KN has been closely correlated with LFUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KN jumps, then LFUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KN
1D Price
Change %
KN100%
-2.19%
LFUS - KN
73%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
TEL - KN
72%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
BELFB - KN
72%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
CTS - KN
72%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
PLXS - KN
72%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
More