Advertisement
CTOWY vs LMGHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTOWY is a Hold and LMGHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTOWY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLMGHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CTOWY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LMGHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CTOWY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LMGHF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.65%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (-0.33% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CTOWY | LMGHF | CTOWY / LMGHF | |
| Capitalization | 24.8B | 954M | 2,600% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 728M | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.882 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 14.83 | 18.75 | 79% |
| Revenue | N/A | 6.97B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.45B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 3.41B | - |
| CTOWY | LMGHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 9% | 4 days ago 4% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 8% | 4 days ago 4% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
CTOWY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CTOWY and CUCSF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTOWY and CUCSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTOWY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTOWY | 100% | N/A | ||
| CUCSF - CTOWY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LLEIF - CTOWY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LMGHF - CTOWY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HTWSF - CTOWY | 0% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
| PTTWF - CTOWY | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
LMGHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LMGHF and SHEN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMGHF and SHEN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMGHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMGHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SHEN - LMGHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.52% | ||
| KDDIF - LMGHF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LILA - LMGHF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LILAK - LMGHF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IHS - LMGHF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
More | ||||