CTOWY
Price
$11.40
Change
-$0.60 (-5.00%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
26.01B
LMGHF
Price
$2.10
Change
+$0.30 (+16.67%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
859.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTOWY vs LMGHF

Header iconCTOWY vs LMGHF Comparison
Open Charts CTOWY vs LMGHFBanner chart's image
China Tower
Price$11.40
Change-$0.60 (-5.00%)
Volume$159
Capitalization26.01B
VICTORY PARTN VIII NORWAY HLDG AS
Price$2.10
Change+$0.30 (+16.67%)
Volume$11.5K
Capitalization859.5M
CTOWY vs LMGHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTOWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTOWY vs. LMGHF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTOWY is a Hold and LMGHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CTOWY: $10.16 vs. LMGHF: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: CTOWY and LMGHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTOWY: 100% vs. LMGHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CTOWY: $26.01B vs. LMGHF: $859.5M
CTOWY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $26.01B. LMGHF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $859.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTOWY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMGHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTOWY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LMGHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTOWY is a better buy in the long-term than LMGHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTOWY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CTOWY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CTOWY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LMGHF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.03% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTOWY($26B) has a higher market cap than LMGHF($860M). LMGHF has higher P/E ratio than CTOWY: LMGHF (18.75) vs CTOWY (14.83). LMGHF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CTOWY (-5.882).
CTOWYLMGHFCTOWY / LMGHF
Capitalization26B860M3,023%
EBITDAN/A687M-
Gain YTD-5.8820.000-
P/E Ratio14.8318.7579%
RevenueN/A6.92B-
Total CashN/A1.79B-
Total DebtN/A2.67B-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTOWYLMGHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTOWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGMS5.150.41
+8.65%
Bio Green Med Solution Inc
ALHC17.530.22
+1.27%
Alignment Healthcare
NBIS107.70-0.24
-0.22%
Nebius Group N.V.
KRUS61.99-0.26
-0.42%
Kura Sushi USA
BVFL16.43-0.11
-0.67%
BV Financial

CTOWY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTOWY and CUCSF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTOWY and CUCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTOWY
1D Price
Change %
CTOWY100%
N/A
CUCSF - CTOWY
0%
Poorly correlated
+8.57%
LLEIF - CTOWY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMGHF - CTOWY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTWSF - CTOWY
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
PTTWF - CTOWY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LMGHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMGHF and SHEN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMGHF and SHEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMGHF
1D Price
Change %
LMGHF100%
N/A
SHEN - LMGHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
KDDIF - LMGHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
LILA - LMGHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
LILAK - LMGHF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
IHS - LMGHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More