CTOWY
Price
$11.40
Change
-$0.60 (-5.00%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
19.86B
CUCSF
Price
$0.59
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.29B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTOWY vs CUCSF

Header iconCTOWY vs CUCSF Comparison
Open Charts CTOWY vs CUCSFBanner chart's image
China Tower
Price$11.40
Change-$0.60 (-5.00%)
Volume$159
Capitalization19.86B
China Communications Services
Price$0.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.35K
Capitalization3.29B
CTOWY vs CUCSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTOWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CUCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTOWY vs. CUCSF commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTOWY is a Hold and CUCSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CTOWY: $10.33 vs. CUCSF: $0.59)
Brand notoriety: CTOWY and CUCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTOWY: 100% vs. CUCSF: 82%
Market capitalization -- CTOWY: $19.86B vs. CUCSF: $3.29B
CTOWY [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $19.86B. CUCSF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $3.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTOWY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCUCSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTOWY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CUCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUCSF is a better buy in the long-term than CTOWY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTOWY’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CUCSF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTOWY’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CUCSF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTOWY is a better buy in the short-term than CUCSF.

Price Growth

CTOWY (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CUCSF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.86% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTOWY($19.9B) has a higher market cap than CUCSF($3.29B). CTOWY has higher P/E ratio than CUCSF: CTOWY (14.99) vs CUCSF (7.86). CUCSF YTD gains are higher at: 37.454 vs. CTOWY (-5.882). CTOWY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 64.1B vs. CUCSF (3.79B). CUCSF has higher revenues than CTOWY: CUCSF (139B) vs CTOWY (92.2B).
CTOWYCUCSFCTOWY / CUCSF
Capitalization19.9B3.29B605%
EBITDA64.1B3.79B1,693%
Gain YTD-5.88237.454-16%
P/E Ratio14.997.86191%
Revenue92.2B139B66%
Total CashN/A19.5B-
Total DebtN/A2.53B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUCSF: Fundamental Ratings
CUCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
74
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTOWYCUCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTOWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CUCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WFATX40.060.05
+0.12%
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Instl
ELFNX95.050.09
+0.09%
Elfun Trusts
MSAUX23.05N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Asia Opp A
NBMVX47.84-0.10
-0.21%
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Adv
CGFAX81.84-0.27
-0.33%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A

CTOWY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTOWY and CUCSF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTOWY and CUCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTOWY
1D Price
Change %
CTOWY100%
N/A
CUCSF - CTOWY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LLEIF - CTOWY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMGHF - CTOWY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTWSF - CTOWY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTTWF - CTOWY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CUCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUCSF and TTRAF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUCSF and TTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUCSF
1D Price
Change %
CUCSF100%
N/A
TTRAF - CUCSF
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
HTWSF - CUCSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KORE - CUCSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.71%
MYTEF - CUCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRTAY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More