It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTOS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWRLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTOS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRLD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTOS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +1.80% price change this week, while WRLD (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -3.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.26%.
CTOS is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
WRLD is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
CTOS | WRLD | CTOS / WRLD | |
Capitalization | 1.4B | 882M | 159% |
EBITDA | 408M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -17.476 | -9.592 | 182% |
P/E Ratio | 28.00 | 12.23 | 229% |
Revenue | 1.87B | 526M | 355% |
Total Cash | 10.3M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 2.2B | 667M | 329% |
CTOS | WRLD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WRLD's Valuation (64) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTOS (98) in the null industry. This means that WRLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTOS’s over the last 12 months.
WRLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CTOS (100) in the null industry. This means that WRLD’s stock grew similarly to CTOS’s over the last 12 months.
WRLD's SMR Rating (12) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTOS (91) in the null industry. This means that WRLD’s stock grew significantly faster than CTOS’s over the last 12 months.
CTOS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as WRLD (52) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CTOS’s stock grew similarly to WRLD’s over the last 12 months.
CTOS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WRLD (88) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CTOS’s stock grew significantly faster than WRLD’s over the last 12 months.
CTOS | WRLD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 5 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTOS has been loosely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTOS jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CTOS | 100% | +2.00% | ||
ENVA - CTOS | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
ATLC - CTOS | 40% Loosely correlated | +6.54% | ||
ECPG - CTOS | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
LC - CTOS | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
WRLD - CTOS | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRLD has been loosely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRLD jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WRLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WRLD | 100% | -1.11% | ||
ENVA - WRLD | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
CACC - WRLD | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
ATLC - WRLD | 47% Loosely correlated | +6.54% | ||
LC - WRLD | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
WSC - WRLD | 42% Loosely correlated | -5.36% | ||
More |