Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTOGX vs PMAQX
CTOGX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CTOGX vs PMAQX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth R6
Price$17.74
Change-$0.26 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.08M
CTOGX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTOGX vs. PMAQX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTOGX is a Hold and PMAQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 31.3B vs. CTOGX (38.1M). CTOGX (0.00) and PMAQX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTOGX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CTOGX (6 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CTOGX (1.53) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). CTOGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). CTOGX (0) and PMAQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTOGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.40 vs. PMAQX (-0.77). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 23.62 vs. CTOGX (11.59).
| CTOGX | PMAQX | CTOGX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.59 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.59 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.720 | 2.470 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.1M | 31.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.40 | -0.77 | -2,138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.72 | 32.89 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.59 | 23.62 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement