CTNGY
Price
$3.30
Change
-$0.03 (-0.90%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
467.96M
WLGS
Price
$11.00
Change
-$0.65 (-5.58%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
768.59K
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTNGY vs WLGS

Header iconCTNGY vs WLGS Comparison
Open Charts CTNGY vs WLGSBanner chart's image
Costain Group
Price$3.30
Change-$0.03 (-0.90%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization467.96M
Wang & Lee Group
Price$11.00
Change-$0.65 (-5.58%)
Volume$114.22K
Capitalization768.59K
CTNGY vs WLGS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WLGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTNGY vs. WLGS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTNGY is a Hold and WLGS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CTNGY: $3.30 vs. WLGS: $11.00)
Brand notoriety: CTNGY and WLGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTNGY: 100% vs. WLGS: 32%
Market capitalization -- CTNGY: $467.96M vs. WLGS: $768.59K
CTNGY [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $467.96M. WLGS’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $768.59K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTNGY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTNGY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTNGY is a better buy in the long-term than WLGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WLGS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WLGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CTNGY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLGS (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +201.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.30% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTNGY($468M) has a higher market cap than WLGS($769K). WLGS has higher P/E ratio than CTNGY: WLGS (12.80) vs CTNGY (10.99). CTNGY YTD gains are higher at: 134.350 vs. WLGS (-97.507).
CTNGYWLGSCTNGY / WLGS
Capitalization468M769K60,858%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD134.350-97.507-138%
P/E Ratio10.9912.8086%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A2.46M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTNGYWLGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WLGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LADSX24.150.35
+1.47%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R4
GGESX26.030.28
+1.09%
Nationwide Global Sust Eq Instl Svc
WPSGX56.880.54
+0.96%
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
PEIQX42.850.36
+0.85%
Principal Equity Income R5
MRCEX12.810.09
+0.71%
Meridian Hedged Equity C

CTNGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTNGY has been loosely correlated with ESOA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTNGY jumps, then ESOA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTNGY
1D Price
Change %
CTNGY100%
N/A
ESOA - CTNGY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
OPMXF - CTNGY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLGS - CTNGY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EKIVY - CTNGY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFXXF - CTNGY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WLGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLGS and FIX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLGS and FIX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLGS
1D Price
Change %
WLGS100%
N/A
FIX - WLGS
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
EME - WLGS
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
BBCP - WLGS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
MTZ - WLGS
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
AGX - WLGS
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
More