CTMLF
Price
$8.79
Change
+$0.22 (+2.57%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.04B
HWGG
Price
$2.35
Change
-$0.05 (-2.08%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTMLF vs HWGG

Header iconCTMLF vs HWGG Comparison
Open Charts CTMLF vs HWGGBanner chart's image
Corporate Travel Management
Price$8.79
Change+$0.22 (+2.57%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.04B
HWGG Entertainment
Price$2.35
Change-$0.05 (-2.08%)
Volume$600
Capitalization5B
CTMLF vs HWGG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTMLF vs. HWGG commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTMLF is a Hold and HWGG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CTMLF: $8.79 vs. HWGG: $2.35)
Brand notoriety: CTMLF and HWGG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTMLF: 283% vs. HWGG: 12%
Market capitalization -- CTMLF: $2.04B vs. HWGG: $5B
CTMLF [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $2.04B. HWGG’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $10.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHWGG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HWGG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTMLF is a better buy in the long-term than HWGG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTMLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWGG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTMLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • HWGG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTMLF is a better buy in the short-term than HWGG.

Price Growth

CTMLF (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HWGG (@Other Consumer Services) price change was -21.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +3.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+3.28% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWGG($5B) has a higher market cap than CTMLF($2.04B). CTMLF YTD gains are higher at: 11.219 vs. HWGG (-21.141). CTMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 86.8M vs. HWGG (-3.47M). CTMLF has more cash in the bank: 142M vs. HWGG (1.16M). HWGG has less debt than CTMLF: HWGG (37K) vs CTMLF (48.4M). CTMLF has higher revenues than HWGG: CTMLF (508M) vs HWGG (389K).
CTMLFHWGGCTMLF / HWGG
Capitalization2.04B5B41%
EBITDA86.8M-3.47M-2,501%
Gain YTD11.219-21.141-53%
P/E Ratio92.59N/A-
Revenue508M389K130,591%
Total Cash142M1.16M12,273%
Total Debt48.4M37K130,811%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTMLF vs HWGG: Fundamental Ratings
CTMLF
HWGG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5073
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
87100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5798
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTMLF's Valuation (95) in the null industry is in the same range as HWGG (96). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew similarly to HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as HWGG (100). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew similarly to HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as HWGG (100). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew similarly to HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWGG (98). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HWGG (100). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTMLFHWGG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASMMX29.990.39
+1.32%
Invesco Summit A
RPGEX45.910.33
+0.72%
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock
LRSRX13.550.08
+0.59%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R3
SBASX12.690.06
+0.48%
Segall Bryant &Hamill Small Cap Cre Ins
FSPSX57.37-0.04
-0.07%
Fidelity International Index

CTMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTMLF and HWGG have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTMLF and HWGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTMLF
1D Price
Change %
CTMLF100%
N/A
HWGG - CTMLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
TCOM - CTMLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
DRTGF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
HSWLF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGETF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HWGG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWGG and GDDFF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWGG and GDDFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWGG
1D Price
Change %
HWGG100%
-2.08%
GDDFF - HWGG
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRTGF - HWGG
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
FGETF - HWGG
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WGHTQ - HWGG
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTMLF - HWGG
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More