CTMLF
Price
$8.79
Change
+$0.22 (+2.57%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.04B
HSWLF
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.15 (-9.09%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
206.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTMLF vs HSWLF

Header iconCTMLF vs HSWLF Comparison
Open Charts CTMLF vs HSWLFBanner chart's image
Corporate Travel Management
Price$8.79
Change+$0.22 (+2.57%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.04B
Hostelworld Group
Price$1.50
Change-$0.15 (-9.09%)
Volume$912
Capitalization206.35M
CTMLF vs HSWLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HSWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTMLF vs. HSWLF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTMLF is a Hold and HSWLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CTMLF: $8.79 vs. HSWLF: $1.50)
Brand notoriety: CTMLF and HSWLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTMLF: 283% vs. HSWLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CTMLF: $2.04B vs. HSWLF: $206.35M
CTMLF [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $2.04B. HSWLF’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $206.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $10.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHSWLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HSWLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTMLF is a better buy in the long-term than HSWLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTMLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HSWLF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTMLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • HSWLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTMLF is a better buy in the short-term than HSWLF.

Price Growth

CTMLF (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HSWLF (@Other Consumer Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +3.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+3.64% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTMLF($2.04B) has a higher market cap than HSWLF($206M). CTMLF YTD gains are higher at: 11.219 vs. HSWLF (-9.091). CTMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 86.8M vs. HSWLF (-16.71M). CTMLF has more cash in the bank: 142M vs. HSWLF (22.6M). HSWLF has less debt than CTMLF: HSWLF (30.6M) vs CTMLF (48.4M). CTMLF has higher revenues than HSWLF: CTMLF (508M) vs HSWLF (42M).
CTMLFHSWLFCTMLF / HSWLF
Capitalization2.04B206M992%
EBITDA86.8M-16.71M-520%
Gain YTD11.219-9.091-123%
P/E Ratio92.59N/A-
Revenue508M42M1,210%
Total Cash142M22.6M628%
Total Debt48.4M30.6M158%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTMLF vs HSWLF: Fundamental Ratings
CTMLF
HSWLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8751
SMR RATING
1..100
8797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5778
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1297
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HSWLF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTMLF (95). This means that HSWLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HSWLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTMLF (87). This means that HSWLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as HSWLF (97). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew similarly to HSWLF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as HSWLF (78). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew similarly to HSWLF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HSWLF (97). This means that CTMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than HSWLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTMLFHSWLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
23%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HSWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EGORX19.530.17
+0.88%
Allspring Large Cap Core R6
GRMSX29.240.24
+0.83%
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Svc
GMNAX11.340.09
+0.80%
Gabelli Global Mini Mites A
MASOX10.310.06
+0.59%
MoA Small Cap Equity Index Fund
PRPPX15.030.04
+0.27%
Principal International Equity R3

CTMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTMLF and HWGG have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTMLF and HWGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTMLF
1D Price
Change %
CTMLF100%
N/A
HWGG - CTMLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
TCOM - CTMLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
DRTGF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
HSWLF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGETF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HSWLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HSWLF and WOSSF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HSWLF and WOSSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSWLF
1D Price
Change %
HSWLF100%
N/A
WOSSF - HSWLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTRP - HSWLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.33%
EDDRF - HSWLF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDDFF - HSWLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCOM - HSWLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
More