CTMCF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
7.71M
CXBMF
Price
$2.17
Change
-$0.04 (-1.81%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
586.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTMCF vs CXBMF

Header iconCTMCF vs CXBMF Comparison
Open Charts CTMCF vs CXBMFBanner chart's image
Canterra Minerals
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$626.99K
Capitalization7.71M
Calibre Mining
Price$2.17
Change-$0.04 (-1.81%)
Volume$1.43M
Capitalization586.8M
CTMCF vs CXBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CXBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTMCF vs. CXBMF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTMCF is a Hold and CXBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (CTMCF: $0.07 vs. CXBMF: $2.17)
Brand notoriety: CTMCF and CXBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTMCF: 146% vs. CXBMF: 150%
Market capitalization -- CTMCF: $7.71M vs. CXBMF: $586.8M
CTMCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.71M. CXBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $586.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCXBMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CXBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXBMF is a better buy in the long-term than CTMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTMCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CXBMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTMCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CXBMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CXBMF is a better buy in the short-term than CTMCF.

Price Growth

CTMCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.36% price change this week, while CXBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXBMF($587M) has a higher market cap than CTMCF($7.71M). CXBMF YTD gains are higher at: 45.638 vs. CTMCF (-8.887). CXBMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 137M vs. CTMCF (-1.41M). CXBMF has more cash in the bank: 58.3M vs. CTMCF (792K). CXBMF has higher revenues than CTMCF: CXBMF (429M) vs CTMCF (0).
CTMCFCXBMFCTMCF / CXBMF
Capitalization7.71M587M1%
EBITDA-1.41M137M-1%
Gain YTD-8.88745.638-19%
P/E RatioN/A12.59-
Revenue0429M-
Total Cash792K58.3M1%
Total DebtN/A15.9M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTMCF vs CXBMF: Fundamental Ratings
CTMCF
CXBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9854
SMR RATING
1..100
9379
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
524
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CXBMF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CTMCF (84). This means that CXBMF’s stock grew similarly to CTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

CXBMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTMCF (98). This means that CXBMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

CXBMF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as CTMCF (93). This means that CXBMF’s stock grew similarly to CTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMCF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CXBMF (48). This means that CTMCF’s stock grew similarly to CXBMF’s over the last 12 months.

CXBMF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTMCF (52). This means that CXBMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTMCFCXBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CXBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA329.6510.24
+3.21%
Tesla
AAPL211.181.16
+0.55%
Apple
SPY627.58-0.46
-0.07%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
GME23.28-0.12
-0.51%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X117300.790000-639.187500
-0.54%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

CTMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTMCF and DCHRF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTMCF and DCHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTMCF
1D Price
Change %
CTMCF100%
+2.20%
DCHRF - CTMCF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNRIF - CTMCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRCUF - CTMCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
CXBMF - CTMCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPNFF - CTMCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More

CXBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXBMF has been loosely correlated with EQX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXBMF jumps, then EQX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXBMF
1D Price
Change %
CXBMF100%
N/A
EQX - CXBMF
66%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AGI - CXBMF
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
ARMN - CXBMF
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
BTG - CXBMF
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.48%
AEM - CXBMF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
More