CTM
Price
$1.32
Change
+$0.06 (+4.76%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
119.87M
FWFW
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.09 (-39.13%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTM vs FWFW

Header iconCTM vs FWFW Comparison
Open Charts CTM vs FWFWBanner chart's image
Castellum
Price$1.32
Change+$0.06 (+4.76%)
Volume$1.53M
Capitalization119.87M
Flywheel Advanced Technology
Price$0.14
Change-$0.09 (-39.13%)
Volume$372
Capitalization4.15M
CTM vs FWFW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWFW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTM vs. FWFW commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTM is a Hold and FWFW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CTM: $1.32 vs. FWFW: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: CTM and FWFW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTM: 60% vs. FWFW: 66%
Market capitalization -- CTM: $119.87M vs. FWFW: $4.15M
CTM [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $119.87M. FWFW’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $4.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $241.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFWFW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FWFW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTM is a better buy in the long-term than FWFW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FWFW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FWFW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CTM and FWFW are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CTM (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -11.41% price change this week, while FWFW (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-1.00% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTM($120M) has a higher market cap than FWFW($4.15M). FWFW YTD gains are higher at: -29.950 vs. CTM (-34.000). FWFW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -113.55K vs. CTM (-5.57M). CTM has more cash in the bank: 13.3M vs. FWFW (440K). FWFW has less debt than CTM: FWFW (544K) vs CTM (9.15M). CTM has higher revenues than FWFW: CTM (45.1M) vs FWFW (0).
CTMFWFWCTM / FWFW
Capitalization120M4.15M2,894%
EBITDA-5.57M-113.55K4,904%
Gain YTD-34.000-29.950114%
P/E RatioN/A1.08-
Revenue45.1M0-
Total Cash13.3M440K3,023%
Total Debt9.15M544K1,683%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTM vs FWFW: Fundamental Ratings
CTM
FWFW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3465
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FWFW's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as CTM (42). This means that FWFW’s stock grew similarly to CTM’s over the last 12 months.

FWFW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTM (100). This means that FWFW’s stock grew similarly to CTM’s over the last 12 months.

FWFW's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CTM (97). This means that FWFW’s stock grew similarly to CTM’s over the last 12 months.

CTM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FWFW (65). This means that CTM’s stock grew similarly to FWFW’s over the last 12 months.

CTM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FWFW (100). This means that CTM’s stock grew similarly to FWFW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTMFWFW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWFW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CURI4.770.22
+4.84%
CuriosityStream
ECVT8.990.20
+2.28%
Ecovyst
SHOP122.08N/A
N/A
Shopify Inc
PAAS29.14-0.13
-0.44%
Pan American Silver Corp
OWLT8.17-0.16
-1.92%
Owlet

CTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTM and BBAI have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTM and BBAI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTM
1D Price
Change %
CTM100%
+4.76%
BBAI - CTM
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.26%
VNET - CTM
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
CNDT - CTM
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
CACI - CTM
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
AUR - CTM
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More

FWFW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FWFW and CCCMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FWFW and CCCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWFW
1D Price
Change %
FWFW100%
N/A
CCCMF - FWFW
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTCYF - FWFW
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOTE - FWFW
8%
Poorly correlated
+4.62%
FCCN - FWFW
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.98%
CTM - FWFW
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
More