CTM
Price
$1.11
Change
-$0.02 (-1.77%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
100.8M
FWFW
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTM vs FWFW

Header iconCTM vs FWFW Comparison
Open Charts CTM vs FWFWBanner chart's image
Castellum
Price$1.11
Change-$0.02 (-1.77%)
Volume$929.31K
Capitalization100.8M
Flywheel Advanced Technology
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization3.85M
CTM vs FWFW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWFW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTM vs. FWFW commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTM is a Buy and FWFW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CTM: $1.11 vs. FWFW: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: CTM and FWFW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTM: 54% vs. FWFW: 35%
Market capitalization -- CTM: $100.8M vs. FWFW: $3.85M
CTM [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $100.8M. FWFW’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $3.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $271.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFWFW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FWFW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTM is a better buy in the long-term than FWFW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FWFW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FWFW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTM is a better buy in the short-term than FWFW.

Price Growth

CTM (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +4.72% price change this week, while FWFW (@Information Technology Services) price change was +0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+2.78% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTM($101M) has a higher market cap than FWFW($3.85M). FWFW YTD gains are higher at: -34.900 vs. CTM (-44.500). FWFW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -113.55K vs. CTM (-5.57M). CTM has more cash in the bank: 13.3M vs. FWFW (440K). FWFW has less debt than CTM: FWFW (544K) vs CTM (9.15M). CTM has higher revenues than FWFW: CTM (45.1M) vs FWFW (0).
CTMFWFWCTM / FWFW
Capitalization101M3.85M2,621%
EBITDA-5.57M-113.55K4,904%
Gain YTD-44.500-34.900128%
P/E RatioN/A1.00-
Revenue45.1M0-
Total Cash13.3M440K3,023%
Total Debt9.15M544K1,683%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTM vs FWFW: Fundamental Ratings
CTM
FWFW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3665
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FWFW's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as CTM (40). This means that FWFW’s stock grew similarly to CTM’s over the last 12 months.

FWFW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTM (100). This means that FWFW’s stock grew similarly to CTM’s over the last 12 months.

FWFW's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CTM (97). This means that FWFW’s stock grew similarly to CTM’s over the last 12 months.

CTM's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FWFW (65). This means that CTM’s stock grew similarly to FWFW’s over the last 12 months.

CTM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FWFW (100). This means that CTM’s stock grew similarly to FWFW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTMFWFW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FWFW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLSI5.070.17
+3.47%
TriSalus Life Sciences
CVAC5.450.05
+0.93%
CureVac NV
UBS34.880.11
+0.32%
UBS Group AG
GRFS9.08-0.06
-0.66%
Grifols SA
FTEK2.80-0.08
-2.78%
Fuel Tech

CTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTM and BBAI have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTM and BBAI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTM
1D Price
Change %
CTM100%
-1.77%
BBAI - CTM
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
VNET - CTM
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.46%
CNDT - CTM
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
CACI - CTM
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
KD - CTM
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
More

FWFW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FWFW and CCCMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FWFW and CCCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWFW
1D Price
Change %
FWFW100%
N/A
CCCMF - FWFW
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTCYF - FWFW
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOTE - FWFW
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.72%
FCCN - FWFW
6%
Poorly correlated
-7.25%
CTM - FWFW
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
More