It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTLT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESPR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTLT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESPR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTLT (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -1.69% price change this week, while ESPR (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +56.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.95%.
CTLT is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
ESPR is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
CTLT | ESPR | CTLT / ESPR | |
Capitalization | 10.2B | 496M | 2,056% |
EBITDA | -754M | -150.11M | 502% |
Gain YTD | 31.115 | -29.766 | -105% |
P/E Ratio | 208.33 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 4.1B | 116M | 3,533% |
Total Cash | 229M | 82.2M | 279% |
Total Debt | 5.01B | 266M | 1,885% |
CTLT | ESPR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESPR's Valuation (32) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTLT (95) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that ESPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTLT’s over the last 12 months.
CTLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as ESPR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CTLT’s stock grew similarly to ESPR’s over the last 12 months.
CTLT's SMR Rating (96) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as ESPR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CTLT’s stock grew similarly to ESPR’s over the last 12 months.
ESPR's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CTLT (47) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that ESPR’s stock grew similarly to CTLT’s over the last 12 months.
CTLT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESPR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CTLT’s stock grew significantly faster than ESPR’s over the last 12 months.
CTLT | ESPR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago89% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTLT has been loosely correlated with AGYTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTLT jumps, then AGYTF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CTLT | 100% | -0.41% | ||
AGYTF - CTLT | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
ESPR - CTLT | 31% Poorly correlated | -5.83% | ||
TXMD - CTLT | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
ELAN - CTLT | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.06% | ||
ALVO - CTLT | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ESPR and ORGO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESPR and ORGO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESPR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ESPR | 100% | -5.83% | ||
ORGO - ESPR | 32% Poorly correlated | -9.59% | ||
CTLT - ESPR | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
SCYX - ESPR | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.33% | ||
EVO - ESPR | 26% Poorly correlated | +12.09% | ||
PAHC - ESPR | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
More |