Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTLAX vs RLBAX
CTLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CTLAX vs RLBAX
American Funds College 2033 529A
Price$13.80
Change-$0.05 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.11B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.04
Change-$0.16 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.26B
CTLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTLAX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. CTLAX (4.11B). CTLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CTLAX (2.49) vs RLBAX (1.15). CTLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CTLAX (11 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CTLAX (0.72). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CTLAX (6.00). CTLAX (250) and RLBAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.55 vs. RLBAX (6.99). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.63 vs. CTLAX (21.41).
| CTLAX | RLBAX | CTLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.111 | 12.236 | 91% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.11B | 263B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 1.15 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.55 | 6.99 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.38 | 47.80 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.41 | 39.63 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.26 | 74.05 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement