It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTKB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileENOV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTKB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ENOV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTKB (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +10.71% price change this week, while ENOV (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +10.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.73%.
CTKB is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
ENOV is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
CTKB | ENOV | CTKB / ENOV | |
Capitalization | 513M | 1.63B | 32% |
EBITDA | -12.03M | -471.91M | 3% |
Gain YTD | -37.904 | -35.187 | 108% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 197M | 2.15B | 9% |
Total Cash | 266M | 38.5M | 691% |
Total Debt | 15.9M | 1.46B | 1% |
ENOV | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTKB | ENOV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago76% | 20 days ago61% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago84% | 6 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago70% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SDGCX | 91.46 | 0.53 | +0.58% |
DWS Capital Growth C | |||
PJORX | 16.61 | 0.06 | +0.36% |
PGIM Jennison Focused Value R | |||
ARRFX | 14.01 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value N | |||
FCIKX | 16.96 | -0.04 | -0.24% |
NYLI PineStone International Eq Inv Cl | |||
EISMX | 40.22 | -0.11 | -0.27% |
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap I |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTKB has been loosely correlated with GMED. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTKB jumps, then GMED could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTKB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CTKB | 100% | -1.95% | ||
GMED - CTKB | 46% Loosely correlated | +8.47% | ||
CRL - CTKB | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
TMCI - CTKB | 45% Loosely correlated | +7.92% | ||
VREX - CTKB | 43% Loosely correlated | +21.38% | ||
ENOV - CTKB | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENOV has been loosely correlated with CNMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ENOV jumps, then CNMD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENOV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ENOV | 100% | -0.28% | ||
CNMD - ENOV | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.42% | ||
IART - ENOV | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.61% | ||
ITGR - ENOV | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
NPO - ENOV | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
SYK - ENOV | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More |