CTJHY
Price
$10.16
Change
+$0.06 (+0.59%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Capitalization
383.9M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SNLGF
Price
$0.65
Change
+$0.07 (+12.07%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
45.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTJHY vs SNLGF

Header iconCTJHY vs SNLGF Comparison
Open Charts CTJHY vs SNLGFBanner chart's image
Citic Resources Holdings
Price$10.16
Change+$0.06 (+0.59%)
Volume$128
Capitalization383.9M
SAN LORENZO GOLD
Price$0.65
Change+$0.07 (+12.07%)
Volume$5.62K
Capitalization45.1M
CTJHY vs SNLGF Comparison Chart in %
CTJHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SNLGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTJHY vs. SNLGF commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTJHY is a Hold and SNLGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CTJHY: $10.16 vs. SNLGF: $0.65)
Brand notoriety: CTJHY and SNLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTJHY: 122% vs. SNLGF: 38%
Market capitalization -- CTJHY: $383.9M vs. SNLGF: $45.1M
CTJHY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $383.9M. SNLGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $45.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTJHY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTJHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SNLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTJHY is a better buy in the long-term than SNLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTJHY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNLGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTJHY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SNLGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNLGF is a better buy in the short-term than CTJHY.

Price Growth

CTJHY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNLGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +22.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +8.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+8.93% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTJHY($384M) has a higher market cap than SNLGF($45.1M). SNLGF has higher P/E ratio than CTJHY: SNLGF (33.10) vs CTJHY (8.35). SNLGF YTD gains are higher at: 1802.196 vs. CTJHY (46.924). CTJHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 634M vs. SNLGF (-349.26K). CTJHY has more cash in the bank: 4.42B vs. SNLGF (668K). SNLGF has less debt than CTJHY: SNLGF (1.99M) vs CTJHY (4.36B). CTJHY has higher revenues than SNLGF: CTJHY (14.9B) vs SNLGF (0).
CTJHYSNLGFCTJHY / SNLGF
Capitalization384M45.1M851%
EBITDA634M-349.26K-181,528%
Gain YTD46.9241802.1963%
P/E Ratio8.3533.1025%
Revenue14.9B0-
Total Cash4.42B668K661,527%
Total Debt4.36B1.99M219,136%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTJHY: Fundamental Ratings
CTJHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47
SMR RATING
1..100
80
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTJHYSNLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTJHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SNLGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSGRY22.95N/A
N/A
LIXIL Corp.
BPOSY2.35N/A
N/A
Bpost SA
TMAK10.00N/A
N/A
Touchmark Bancshares, Inc.
JBAXY15.86-0.02
-0.15%
Julius Baer Group Ltd.
RREE0.15-0.08
-34.74%
ResourceTec Corporation

CTJHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTJHY and SNLGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTJHY and SNLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTJHY
1D Price
Change %
CTJHY100%
N/A
SNLGF - CTJHY
29%
Poorly correlated
+11.13%
ATMTF - CTJHY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETRUF - CTJHY
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.21%
JMXXF - CTJHY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCCFF - CTJHY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A

SNLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNLGF has been loosely correlated with CVWFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNLGF jumps, then CVWFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNLGF
1D Price
Change %
SNLGF100%
+11.13%
CVWFF - SNLGF
41%
Loosely correlated
-50.79%
CTJHY - SNLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTRYF - SNLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILKAF - SNLGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
SMREF - SNLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+28.21%
More