Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTIGX vs PMAQX
CTIGX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CTIGX vs PMAQX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth I
Price$18.01
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.47M
CTIGX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTIGX vs. PMAQX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTIGX is a Hold and PMAQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. CTIGX (37.5M). CTIGX pays higher dividends than PMAQX: CTIGX (2.19) vs PMAQX (0.20). CTIGX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CTIGX (6 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CTIGX (1.56) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). CTIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTIGX: PMAQX (0) vs CTIGX (1000000). CTIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.12 vs. PMAQX (-4.55). CTIGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.01 vs. PMAQX (33.63).
| CTIGX | PMAQX | CTIGX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.59 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.59 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.907 | 3.092 | 644% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.5M | 32B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 0.20 | 1,122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.12 | -4.55 | -288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.22 | 36.03 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.01 | 33.63 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |