Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTIGX vs PMAQX
CTIGX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CTIGX vs PMAQX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth I
Price$18.30
Change+$0.07 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.09M
CTIGX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTIGX vs. PMAQX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTIGX is a Buy and PMAQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 31.5B vs. CTIGX (38.1M). CTIGX pays higher dividends than PMAQX: CTIGX (2.13) vs PMAQX (0.19). CTIGX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CTIGX (6 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CTIGX (1.56) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). CTIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTIGX: PMAQX (0) vs CTIGX (1000000). CTIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. PMAQX (-7.63). CTIGX return over 5 years is better than : 33.91 vs. PMAQX (29.11).
| CTIGX | PMAQX | CTIGX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.59 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.59 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.905 | 1.972 | 1,060% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.1M | 31.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 0.19 | 1,107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.35 | -7.63 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.62 | 33.37 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.91 | 29.11 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement