Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTIGX vs NRGSX
CTIGX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CTIGX vs NRGSX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth I
Price$17.31
Change+$0.09 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.51M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.48
Change+$0.48 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
CTIGX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTIGX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTIGX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.89B vs. CTIGX (36.5M). CTIGX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: CTIGX (2.37) vs NRGSX (0.06). CTIGX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CTIGX (6 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CTIGX (1.56) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CTIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTIGX: NRGSX (0) vs CTIGX (1000000). CTIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.03 vs. NRGSX (-6.97). CTIGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.95 vs. NRGSX (7.76).
| CTIGX | NRGSX | CTIGX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.74 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.74 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.246 | -2.862 | -533% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5M | 8.89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 0.06 | 3,729% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.03 | -6.97 | -359% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.88 | 12.34 | 712% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.95 | 7.76 | 644% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement