Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTIGX vs FSMAX
CTIGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTIGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth I
Price$18.30
Change+$0.07 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.09M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.38
Change+$1.40 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
CTIGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTIGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTIGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. CTIGX (38.1M). CTIGX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: CTIGX (2.13) vs FSMAX (0.43). CTIGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTIGX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CTIGX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTIGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTIGX (1000000). CTIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. FSMAX (3.33). CTIGX (33.91) and FSMAX (33.03) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CTIGX | FSMAX | CTIGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.04 | 3,143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.04 | 4,457% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.905 | 11.125 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.1M | 41B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 0.43 | 494% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.35 | 3.33 | 311% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.62 | 51.85 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.91 | 33.03 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement