Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTHCX vs FSELX
CTHCX vs FSELX Comparison
Open Charts CTHCX vs FSELX
Columbia Global Technology Growth C
Price$80.88
Change+$1.04 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.95B
Fidelity Select Semiconductors
Price$36.00
Change+$0.36 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.76B
CTHCX vs FSELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTHCX vs. FSELX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTHCX is a Buy and FSELX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSELX has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. CTHCX (3.95B). CTHCX (0.00) and FSELX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTHCX was incepted earlier than FSELX: CTHCX (22 years) vs FSELX (40 years). CTHCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FSELX (0.62). FSELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. CTHCX (7.00). FSELX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTHCX: FSELX (0) vs CTHCX (2000). CTHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. FSELX (-1.23). FSELX return over 5 years is better than : 199.30 vs. CTHCX (97.80).
| CTHCX | FSELX | CTHCX / FSELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.221 | 7.559 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.95B | 21.8B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | -1.23 | -874% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.53 | 162.12 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.80 | 199.30 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 364.03 | 354.84 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers