Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTHCX vs FSELX
CTHCX vs FSELX Comparison
Open Charts CTHCX vs FSELX
Columbia Global Technology Growth C
Price$84.30
Change-$0.64 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.12B
Fidelity Select Semiconductors
Price$38.09
Change-$0.75 (-1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.06B
CTHCX vs FSELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTHCX vs. FSELX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTHCX is a Buy and FSELX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSELX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. CTHCX (4.12B). CTHCX (0.00) and FSELX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTHCX was incepted earlier than FSELX: CTHCX (22 years) vs FSELX (40 years). CTHCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FSELX (0.62). FSELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. CTHCX (7.00). FSELX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTHCX: FSELX (0) vs CTHCX (2000). CTHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.98 vs. FSELX (12.89). FSELX return over 5 years is better than : 196.61 vs. CTHCX (93.48).
| CTHCX | FSELX | CTHCX / FSELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.881 | 13.803 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.12B | 23.1B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.98 | 12.89 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.24 | 112.63 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.48 | 196.61 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 374.13 | 413.24 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers