Advertisement
CTEV vs VSEE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTEV is a Hold and VSEE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTEV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVSEE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CTEV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- VSEE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTEV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VSEE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTEV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- VSEE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CTEV (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +2.85% price change this week, while VSEE (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -30.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.40%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (-2.80% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| CTEV | VSEE | CTEV / VSEE | |
| Capitalization | 910M | 8.12M | 11,203% |
| EBITDA | 19.7M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 273.884 | -64.912 | -422% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 936M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 56.4M | 2.33M | 2,424% |
| Total Debt | 4.65B | 10.3M | 45,136% |
| CTEV | VSEE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 30% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GURAX | 32.69 | 0.23 | +0.71% |
| NAA Risk Managed Real Estate A | |||
| FEQTX | 29.90 | 0.20 | +0.67% |
| Fidelity Equity Dividend Income | |||
| NRREX | 13.90 | 0.09 | +0.65% |
| Neuberger Berman Real Estate R6 | |||
| BRXRX | 16.37 | -0.04 | -0.24% |
| MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R1 | |||
| GNXCX | 18.76 | -0.53 | -2.75% |
| AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation C | |||
CTEV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTEV has been loosely correlated with COMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTEV jumps, then COMP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTEV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTEV | 100% | -2.25% | ||
| COMP - CTEV | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| CLSK - CTEV | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| RIOT - CTEV | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| COIN - CTEV | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.75% | ||
| TGL - CTEV | 30% Poorly correlated | -5.70% | ||
More | ||||
VSEE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that VSEE and WEAV have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VSEE and WEAV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VSEE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VSEE | 100% | -7.86% | ||
| WEAV - VSEE | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
| BFRG - VSEE | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CTEV - VSEE | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
| BEAT - VSEE | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
| SOPH - VSEE | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.93% | ||
More | ||||