CTEV
Price
$52.67
Change
+$1.15 (+2.23%)
Updated
Sep 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
848.78M
QLYS
Price
$136.17
Change
+$1.30 (+0.96%)
Updated
Sep 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.87B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTEV vs QLYS

Header iconCTEV vs QLYS Comparison
Open Charts CTEV vs QLYSBanner chart's image
Claritev
Price$52.67
Change+$1.15 (+2.23%)
Volume$500
Capitalization848.78M
Qualys
Price$136.17
Change+$1.30 (+0.96%)
Volume$4.99K
Capitalization4.87B
CTEV vs QLYS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTEV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QLYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTEV vs. QLYS commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTEV is a Hold and QLYS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CTEV: $51.52 vs. QLYS: $134.87)
Brand notoriety: CTEV and QLYS are both not notable
CTEV represents the Services to the Health Industry, while QLYS is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTEV: 53% vs. QLYS: 57%
Market capitalization -- CTEV: $848.78M vs. QLYS: $4.87B
CTEV [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $848.78M. QLYS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $4.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $45.7B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.31B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTEV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQLYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTEV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QLYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QLYS is a better buy in the long-term than CTEV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTEV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QLYS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTEV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QLYS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QLYS is a better buy in the short-term than CTEV.

Price Growth

CTEV (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -9.72% price change this week, while QLYS (@Computer Communications) price change was +2.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.86%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +72.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

QLYS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (+1.86% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Computer Communications (+2.16% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLYS($4.87B) has a higher market cap than CTEV($849M). CTEV YTD gains are higher at: 248.579 vs. QLYS (-3.815). QLYS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 214M vs. CTEV (19.7M). QLYS has more cash in the bank: 370M vs. CTEV (56.4M). QLYS has less debt than CTEV: QLYS (55.3M) vs CTEV (4.65B). CTEV has higher revenues than QLYS: CTEV (936M) vs QLYS (637M).
CTEVQLYSCTEV / QLYS
Capitalization849M4.87B17%
EBITDA19.7M214M9%
Gain YTD248.579-3.815-6,515%
P/E RatioN/A26.87-
Revenue936M637M147%
Total Cash56.4M370M15%
Total Debt4.65B55.3M8,407%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QLYS: Fundamental Ratings
QLYS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTEVQLYS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTEV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QLYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLOZX9.270.08
+0.87%
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Z
MDVYX8.160.03
+0.37%
MassMutual Diversified Value Svc
RIEBX27.400.08
+0.29%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2E
MFWJX18.220.03
+0.16%
MFS Global Total Return R4
BDSIX20.42-0.11
-0.54%
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Core Instl

CTEV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTEV has been loosely correlated with UBER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTEV jumps, then UBER could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTEV
1D Price
Change %
CTEV100%
+0.04%
UBER - CTEV
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
QLYS - CTEV
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
BRZE - CTEV
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
TXG - CTEV
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
DJCO - CTEV
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
More

QLYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLYS has been loosely correlated with TENB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLYS jumps, then TENB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLYS
1D Price
Change %
QLYS100%
-1.11%
TENB - QLYS
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
CCSI - QLYS
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
DJCO - QLYS
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
EVCM - QLYS
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.51%
PCTY - QLYS
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
More