Advertisement
CTEC vs ENPH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTEC is a Hold and ENPH is a Hold.
ENPH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 1 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CTEC | ENPH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ISRA | 53.00 | 0.84 | +1.61% |
| VanEck Israel ETF | |||
| CPSY | 24.16 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan | |||
| VNLA | 49.02 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| Janus Henderson Short Duration Inc ETF | |||
| RFCI | 22.53 | -0.05 | -0.21% |
| RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | |||
| FDV | 28.20 | -0.10 | -0.35% |
| Federated Hermes US Strategic Dvd ETF | |||
CTEC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTEC has been closely correlated with ENPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CTEC jumps, then ENPH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTEC | 100% | +3.45% | ||
| ENPH - CTEC | 76% Closely correlated | +3.91% | ||
| SEDG - CTEC | 72% Closely correlated | +16.69% | ||
| FSLR - CTEC | 72% Closely correlated | +8.51% | ||
| CSIQ - CTEC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| BE - CTEC | 69% Closely correlated | +7.45% | ||
More | ||||
ENPH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENPH has been closely correlated with SEDG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENPH jumps, then SEDG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENPH | 100% | +3.91% | ||
| SEDG - ENPH | 78% Closely correlated | +16.69% | ||
| RUN - ENPH | 71% Closely correlated | +16.80% | ||
| FSLR - ENPH | 63% Loosely correlated | +8.51% | ||
| CSIQ - ENPH | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| FCEL - ENPH | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.38% | ||
More | ||||