Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTCSX vs NRGSX
CTCSX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CTCSX vs NRGSX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth C
Price$43.98
Change+$0.33 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets519.48M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.48
Change+$0.48 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
CTCSX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.89B vs. CTCSX (519M). CTCSX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: CTCSX (1.61) vs NRGSX (0.06). CTCSX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CTCSX (4 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CTCSX (2.10) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CTCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTCSX: NRGSX (0) vs CTCSX (2500). CTCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.68 vs. NRGSX (-6.97).
| CTCSX | NRGSX | CTCSX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.74 | 277% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.74 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.230 | -2.862 | -707% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 519M | 8.89B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 0.06 | 2,530% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.68 | -6.97 | -425% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.66 | 12.34 | 678% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 7.76 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers