Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTASX vs WCMNX
CTASX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts CTASX vs WCMNX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth A
Price$43.02
Change-$2.17 (-4.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets537.52M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.05
Change-$0.44 (-3.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
CTASX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTASX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTASX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTASX has more cash in the bank: 538M vs. WCMNX (41.9M). CTASX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: CTASX (1.96) vs WCMNX (0.00). CTASX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: CTASX (12 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than CTASX (1.35). CTASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTASX: WCMNX (1000) vs CTASX (2500). CTASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. WCMNX (-3.16). CTASX return over 5 years is better than : 40.27 vs. WCMNX (3.45).
| CTASX | WCMNX | CTASX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.24 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.04 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.774 | 6.304 | 298% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 538M | 41.9M | 1,284% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.79 | -3.16 | -436% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.44 | 22.08 | 346% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.27 | 3.45 | 1,167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement