Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTASX vs NRGSX
CTASX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CTASX vs NRGSX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth A
Price$46.01
Change+$0.95 (+2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets632.55M
CTASX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTASX vs. NRGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTASX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.49B vs. CTASX (633M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CTASX: NRGSX (0.48) vs CTASX (0.00). CTASX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CTASX (12 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CTASX (1.35) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CTASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 195.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTASX: NRGSX (0) vs CTASX (2500). CTASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.10 vs. NRGSX (-12.75). CTASX return over 5 years is better than : 13.35 vs. NRGSX (-23.10).
| CTASX | NRGSX | CTASX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.74 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.74 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.143 | 5.452 | 21% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 633M | 8.49B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.10 | -12.75 | -197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.35 | -6.33 | -1,379% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.35 | -23.10 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 266.98 | 24.83 | 1,075% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers