Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTASX vs NRGSX
CTASX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CTASX vs NRGSX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth A
Price$46.76
Change-$0.20 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets638.52M
CTASX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTASX vs. NRGSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTASX is a Buy and NRGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. CTASX (639M). CTASX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: CTASX (1.92) vs NRGSX (0.07). CTASX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CTASX (12 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CTASX (1.35) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CTASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTASX: NRGSX (0) vs CTASX (2500). CTASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.40 vs. NRGSX (-17.45). CTASX return over 5 years is better than : 32.43 vs. NRGSX (-21.20).
| CTASX | NRGSX | CTASX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.74 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.74 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.100 | -15.960 | -182% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 639M | 8.19B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.07 | 2,956% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.40 | -17.45 | -146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.28 | 1.18 | 8,472% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.43 | -21.20 | -153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.34 | 6.91 | 2,842% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers