CTAS
Price
$204.50
Change
-$2.34 (-1.13%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
82.41B
17 days until earnings call
UNF
Price
$177.77
Change
-$1.19 (-0.66%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.3B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTAS vs UNF

Header iconCTAS vs UNF Comparison
Open Charts CTAS vs UNFBanner chart's image
Cintas
Price$204.50
Change-$2.34 (-1.13%)
Volume$1.41M
Capitalization82.41B
Unifirst
Price$177.77
Change-$1.19 (-0.66%)
Volume$91.71K
Capitalization3.3B
CTAS vs UNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTAS vs. UNF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAS is a Hold and UNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CTAS: $204.50 vs. UNF: $177.77)
Brand notoriety: CTAS and UNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTAS: 88% vs. UNF: 84%
Market capitalization -- CTAS: $82.41B vs. UNF: $3.3B
CTAS [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $82.41B. UNF’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $3.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTAS is a better buy in the long-term than UNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTAS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CTAS and UNF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CTAS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -2.63% price change this week, while UNF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTAS is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

UNF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.25% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTAS($82.4B) has a higher market cap than UNF($3.3B). CTAS has higher P/E ratio than UNF: CTAS (46.48) vs UNF (21.81). CTAS YTD gains are higher at: 12.578 vs. UNF (4.476). UNF has less debt than CTAS: UNF (74.7M) vs CTAS (2.65B).
CTASUNFCTAS / UNF
Capitalization82.4B3.3B2,500%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.5784.476281%
P/E Ratio46.4821.81213%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.65B74.7M3,553%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTAS vs UNF: Fundamental Ratings
CTAS
UNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8672
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
2379
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6261
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6578
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNF's Valuation (70) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CTAS (93). This means that UNF’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.

CTAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNF (100). This means that CTAS’s stock grew significantly faster than UNF’s over the last 12 months.

CTAS's SMR Rating (23) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNF (79). This means that CTAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNF’s over the last 12 months.

UNF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CTAS (62). This means that UNF’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.

CTAS's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as UNF (78). This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to UNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTASUNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WLDR35.650.23
+0.65%
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
AVSD70.100.41
+0.59%
Avantis Responsible International Eq ETF
RSP188.440.22
+0.12%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF
IMF43.78N/A
N/A
Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
TGRW44.00-0.17
-0.39%
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF

CTAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with ARMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then ARMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTAS
1D Price
Change %
CTAS100%
-1.13%
ARMK - CTAS
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
VRSK - CTAS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
EFX - CTAS
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.77%
LOPE - CTAS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
UNF - CTAS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More

UNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNF has been loosely correlated with CTAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNF jumps, then CTAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNF
1D Price
Change %
UNF100%
-0.47%
CTAS - UNF
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
LOPE - UNF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
LTRE - UNF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BRC - UNF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
GHC - UNF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More