CTAS
Price
$190.73
Change
-$1.02 (-0.53%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
76.27B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UNF
Price
$203.00
Change
+$41.72 (+25.87%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.67B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTAS vs UNF

Header iconCTAS vs UNF Comparison
Open Charts CTAS vs UNFBanner chart's image
Cintas
Price$190.73
Change-$1.02 (-0.53%)
Volume$3.03M
Capitalization76.27B
Unifirst
Price$203.00
Change+$41.72 (+25.87%)
Volume$181.06K
Capitalization3.67B
CTAS vs UNF Comparison Chart in %
CTAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTAS vs. UNF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAS is a StrongBuy and UNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CTAS: $190.73 vs. UNF: $203.00)
Brand notoriety: CTAS and UNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTAS: 164% vs. UNF: 76%
Market capitalization -- CTAS: $76.27B vs. UNF: $3.67B
CTAS [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $76.27B. UNF’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $3.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $6.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTAS is a better buy in the long-term than UNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTAS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTAS is a better buy in the short-term than UNF.

Price Growth

CTAS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while UNF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -3.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTAS is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2026.

UNF is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-2.23% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTAS($76.3B) has a higher market cap than UNF($3.67B). CTAS has higher P/E ratio than UNF: CTAS (41.28) vs UNF (26.85). UNF YTD gains are higher at: 5.236 vs. CTAS (1.414). CTAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.99B vs. UNF (315M). CTAS has more cash in the bank: 201M vs. UNF (130M). UNF has less debt than CTAS: UNF (76.9M) vs CTAS (3.24B). CTAS has higher revenues than UNF: CTAS (10.8B) vs UNF (2.45B).
CTASUNFCTAS / UNF
Capitalization76.3B3.67B2,080%
EBITDA2.99B315M950%
Gain YTD1.4145.23627%
P/E Ratio41.2826.85154%
Revenue10.8B2.45B441%
Total Cash201M130M155%
Total Debt3.24B76.9M4,209%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTAS vs UNF: Fundamental Ratings
CTAS
UNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6574
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
2180
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6857
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNF's Valuation (67) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CTAS (89). This means that UNF’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.

CTAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNF (100). This means that CTAS’s stock grew significantly faster than UNF’s over the last 12 months.

CTAS's SMR Rating (21) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNF (80). This means that CTAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNF’s over the last 12 months.

UNF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CTAS (59). This means that UNF’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.

UNF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CTAS (68). This means that UNF’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTASUNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFCEX31.550.39
+1.25%
DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 I
LSRCX0.99N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
LVOAX18.80-0.09
-0.48%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities A
DDDIX21.03-0.29
-1.36%
13D Activist I
WIGRX77.39-1.41
-1.79%
Wasatch Core Growth Institutional

CTAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTAS
1D Price
Change %
CTAS100%
-0.09%
EXPO - CTAS
62%
Loosely correlated
-5.08%
RBA - CTAS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
UNF - CTAS
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.41%
VRSK - CTAS
51%
Loosely correlated
-10.11%
DLB - CTAS
48%
Loosely correlated
-5.33%
More

UNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNF has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNF jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNF
1D Price
Change %
UNF100%
-2.41%
EXPO - UNF
48%
Loosely correlated
-5.08%
CTAS - UNF
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
ARLO - UNF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
CASS - UNF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
LOPE - UNF
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.06%
More