CTAS
Price
$184.71
Change
+$0.52 (+0.28%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
74.23B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ULS
Price
$79.38
Change
-$9.47 (-10.66%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.12B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTAS vs ULS

Header iconCTAS vs ULS Comparison
Open Charts CTAS vs ULSBanner chart's image
Cintas
Price$184.71
Change+$0.52 (+0.28%)
Volume$1.52M
Capitalization74.23B
UL Solutions
Price$79.38
Change-$9.47 (-10.66%)
Volume$14.86K
Capitalization18.12B
CTAS vs ULS Comparison Chart in %
CTAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ULS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTAS vs. ULS commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAS is a StrongBuy and ULS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CTAS: $184.18 vs. ULS: $88.90)
Brand notoriety: CTAS and ULS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTAS: 15% vs. ULS: 10%
Market capitalization -- CTAS: $74.23B vs. ULS: $15.96B
CTAS [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $74.23B. ULS’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $15.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $6.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileULS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ULS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ULS is a better buy in the long-term than CTAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ULS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTAS is a better buy in the short-term than ULS.

Price Growth

CTAS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +0.28% price change this week, while ULS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +4.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTAS is expected to report earnings on Dec 23, 2025.

ULS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (+4.65% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTAS($74.2B) has a higher market cap than ULS($18.1B). ULS has higher P/E ratio than CTAS: ULS (54.01) vs CTAS (41.05). ULS YTD gains are higher at: 79.362 vs. CTAS (1.392). CTAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.92B vs. ULS (657M). ULS has more cash in the bank: 272M vs. CTAS (138M). ULS has less debt than CTAS: ULS (805M) vs CTAS (2.68B). CTAS has higher revenues than ULS: CTAS (10.6B) vs ULS (2.95B).
CTASULSCTAS / ULS
Capitalization74.2B18.1B410%
EBITDA2.92B657M445%
Gain YTD1.39279.3622%
P/E Ratio41.0554.0176%
Revenue10.6B2.95B359%
Total Cash138M272M51%
Total Debt2.68B805M332%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTAS: Fundamental Ratings
CTAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13
SMR RATING
1..100
22
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTASULS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
32%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ULS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COAL21.800.28
+1.28%
Range Global Coal ETF
GSPY37.390.04
+0.12%
Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF
MGV139.71-0.07
-0.05%
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
INCE59.90-0.14
-0.24%
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
PLTM15.82-0.16
-1.00%
GraniteShares Platinum Trust

CTAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTAS
1D Price
Change %
CTAS100%
-0.67%
EXPO - CTAS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
VRSK - CTAS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
ARLO - CTAS
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
EFX - CTAS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
ARMK - CTAS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
More

ULS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULS has been loosely correlated with ARMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULS jumps, then ARMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULS
1D Price
Change %
ULS100%
-1.44%
ARMK - ULS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
RELX - ULS
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTAS - ULS
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
FA - ULS
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
RBA - ULS
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
More