CTAS
Price
$223.88
Change
-$2.39 (-1.06%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
91.18B
44 days until earnings call
ULS
Price
$66.24
Change
-$0.40 (-0.60%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTAS vs ULS

Header iconCTAS vs ULS Comparison
Open Charts CTAS vs ULSBanner chart's image
Cintas
Price$223.88
Change-$2.39 (-1.06%)
Volume$23.2K
Capitalization91.18B
UL Solutions
Price$66.24
Change-$0.40 (-0.60%)
Volume$5.18K
Capitalization13.39B
CTAS vs ULS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTAS vs. ULS commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAS is a StrongBuy and ULS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CTAS: $226.27 vs. ULS: $66.64)
Brand notoriety: CTAS and ULS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTAS: 120% vs. ULS: 122%
Market capitalization -- CTAS: $91.18B vs. ULS: $13.39B
CTAS [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $91.18B. ULS’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $13.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $91.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTAS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileULS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTAS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ULS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTAS is a better buy in the long-term than ULS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTAS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ULS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTAS is a better buy in the short-term than ULS.

Price Growth

CTAS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +2.15% price change this week, while ULS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -7.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTAS is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.20% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTAS($91.2B) has a higher market cap than ULS($13.4B). CTAS has higher P/E ratio than ULS: CTAS (51.42) vs ULS (41.14). ULS YTD gains are higher at: 34.175 vs. CTAS (24.309). CTAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.86B vs. ULS (664M). ULS (267M) and CTAS (264M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . ULS has less debt than CTAS: ULS (843M) vs CTAS (2.65B). CTAS has higher revenues than ULS: CTAS (10.3B) vs ULS (2.91B).
CTASULSCTAS / ULS
Capitalization91.2B13.4B681%
EBITDA2.86B664M431%
Gain YTD24.30934.17571%
P/E Ratio51.4241.14125%
Revenue10.3B2.91B355%
Total Cash264M267M99%
Total Debt2.65B843M315%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTAS: Fundamental Ratings
CTAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
30
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTASULS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VOO585.744.45
+0.77%
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
STXD35.030.15
+0.43%
Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF
BSMP24.51N/A
N/A
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Muncpl Bd ETF
CTEX24.10-0.05
-0.22%
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
IHAK49.54-0.64
-1.28%
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF

CTAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with VRSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then VRSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTAS
1D Price
Change %
CTAS100%
+1.28%
VRSK - CTAS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
ARMK - CTAS
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
EFX - CTAS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
UNF - CTAS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
RELX - CTAS
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
More

ULS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULS has been loosely correlated with ARMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULS jumps, then ARMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULS
1D Price
Change %
ULS100%
+1.02%
ARMK - ULS
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
RELX - ULS
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
CTAS - ULS
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
AZZ - ULS
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
FA - ULS
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.97%
More