Advertisement
CTAS vs RBA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAS is a Hold and RBA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRBA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CTAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RBA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RBA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CTAS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -4.10% price change this week, while RBA (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +0.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTAS is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.
RBA is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.85% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| CTAS | RBA | CTAS / RBA | |
| Capitalization | 87.3B | 21.4B | 408% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 1.38B | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.211 | 28.110 | 68% |
| P/E Ratio | 49.22 | 56.60 | 87% |
| Revenue | N/A | 4.33B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 578M | - |
| Total Debt | 2.65B | 4.25B | 62% |
CTAS | RBA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RBA's Valuation (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CTAS (94) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RBA’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as RBA (7) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to RBA’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's SMR Rating (24) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBA (78) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBA’s over the last 12 months.
RBA's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CTAS (53) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RBA’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
RBA's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CTAS (55) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RBA’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
| CTAS | RBA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 36% | 4 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 61% | 8 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 36% | 4 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 58% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLSW | 37.93 | 0.19 | +0.51% |
| Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | |||
| DYYXF | 3.00 | N/A | N/A |
| Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch) | |||
| VTI | 316.47 | -0.72 | -0.23% |
| Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | |||
| TPSC | 40.41 | -0.37 | -0.92% |
| Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF | |||
| NRK | 9.45 | -0.10 | -1.05% |
| Nuveen New York AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
CTAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with VRSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then VRSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTAS | 100% | -1.97% | ||
| VRSK - CTAS | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| ARMK - CTAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| EFX - CTAS | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| UNF - CTAS | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| LOPE - CTAS | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
More | ||||
RBA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBA has been loosely correlated with PRSU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBA jumps, then PRSU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RBA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBA | 100% | -2.15% | ||
| PRSU - RBA | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| AZZ - RBA | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| MSA - RBA | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| CTAS - RBA | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| GHC - RBA | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||