Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs VEXPX
CTAGX vs VEXPX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs VEXPX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$16.51
Change+$0.24 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.42M
CTAGX vs VEXPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. VEXPX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and VEXPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEXPX has more cash in the bank: 20.5B vs. CTAGX (35.4M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than VEXPX: CTAGX (2.24) vs VEXPX (0.39). CTAGX was incepted earlier than VEXPX: CTAGX (6 years) vs VEXPX (58 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VEXPX (0.44). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. VEXPX (35.00). CTAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEXPX: CTAGX (2500) vs VEXPX (3000). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.47 vs. VEXPX (2.63). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.33 vs. VEXPX (12.14).
| CTAGX | VEXPX | CTAGX / VEXPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.44 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.44 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 58 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.884 | 5.159 | 230% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.4M | 20.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 0.39 | 581% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.47 | 2.63 | 1,196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.88 | 22.05 | 308% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.33 | 12.14 | 390% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 31.21 | - |