Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs VEXPX
CTAGX vs VEXPX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs VEXPX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$15.63
Change+$0.03 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.31M
CTAGX vs VEXPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. VEXPX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a StrongBuy and VEXPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEXPX has more cash in the bank: 19.9B vs. CTAGX (33.3M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than VEXPX: CTAGX (2.37) vs VEXPX (0.40). CTAGX was incepted earlier than VEXPX: CTAGX (6 years) vs VEXPX (58 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VEXPX (0.44). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. VEXPX (35.00). CTAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEXPX: CTAGX (2500) vs VEXPX (3000). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.38 vs. VEXPX (-1.90). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.99 vs. VEXPX (5.07).
| CTAGX | VEXPX | CTAGX / VEXPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.44 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.44 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 58 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.537 | 1.235 | 448% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.3M | 19.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 0.40 | 591% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.38 | -1.90 | -1,127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.02 | 5.40 | 834% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.99 | 5.07 | 690% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement