Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs RPMGX
CTAGX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs RPMGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$17.72
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.47M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.96
Change-$0.06 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.9B
CTAGX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. RPMGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. CTAGX (37.5M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than RPMGX: CTAGX (2.07) vs RPMGX (0.00). CTAGX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: CTAGX (6 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). CTAGX (2500) and RPMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. RPMGX (-8.85). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 38.98 vs. RPMGX (-6.56).
| CTAGX | RPMGX | CTAGX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.75 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.75 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.649 | 3.239 | 607% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.5M | 25.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.81 | -8.85 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.64 | 9.95 | 851% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.98 | -6.56 | -595% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement