Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs RPMGX
CTAGX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs RPMGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$17.50
Change-$0.05 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.27M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$97.11
Change-$5.64 (-5.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
CTAGX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. RPMGX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. CTAGX (38.3M). CTAGX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTAGX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: CTAGX (7 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 192.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). CTAGX (2500) and RPMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.36 vs. RPMGX (-5.89). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 3.14 vs. RPMGX (-16.66).
| CTAGX | RPMGX | CTAGX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.75 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.75 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.160 | -0.134 | -1,616% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.3M | 25.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.36 | -5.89 | -261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.70 | -0.15 | -55,647% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.14 | -16.66 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement