Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs PMAQX
CTAGX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs PMAQX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$17.71
Change-$0.07 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.75M
CTAGX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. PMAQX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Buy and PMAQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 31.2B vs. CTAGX (38.8M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than PMAQX: CTAGX (2.02) vs PMAQX (0.19). CTAGX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CTAGX (6 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: PMAQX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.06 vs. PMAQX (-4.15). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 22.45 vs. CTAGX (15.84).
| CTAGX | PMAQX | CTAGX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.59 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.59 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.581 | -2.218 | -883% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.8M | 31.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.19 | 1,050% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.06 | -4.15 | -387% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.16 | 40.63 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.84 | 22.45 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement