Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs PMAQX
CTAGX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs PMAQX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$18.01
Change+$0.07 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.09M
CTAGX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. PMAQX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Buy and PMAQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 31.6B vs. CTAGX (38.1M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than PMAQX: CTAGX (2.02) vs PMAQX (0.19). CTAGX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CTAGX (6 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: PMAQX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.07 vs. PMAQX (-7.63). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 32.06 vs. PMAQX (29.11).
| CTAGX | PMAQX | CTAGX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.59 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.59 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.662 | 1.972 | 1,048% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.1M | 31.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.19 | 1,050% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.07 | -7.63 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.23 | 33.37 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.06 | 29.11 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |