Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs PMAQX
CTAGX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs PMAQX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$17.72
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.47M
CTAGX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. PMAQX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and PMAQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. CTAGX (37.5M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than PMAQX: CTAGX (2.07) vs PMAQX (0.20). CTAGX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CTAGX (6 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: PMAQX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. PMAQX (-4.55). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 38.98 vs. PMAQX (33.63).
| CTAGX | PMAQX | CTAGX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.59 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.59 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.649 | 3.092 | 635% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.5M | 32B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 0.20 | 1,064% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.81 | -4.55 | -281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.64 | 36.03 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.98 | 33.63 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement