Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs NRGSX
CTAGX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs NRGSX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$17.04
Change+$0.09 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.51M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.48
Change+$0.48 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
CTAGX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.89B vs. CTAGX (36.5M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: CTAGX (2.24) vs NRGSX (0.06). CTAGX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CTAGX (6 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: NRGSX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.76 vs. NRGSX (-6.97). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.79 vs. NRGSX (7.76).
| CTAGX | NRGSX | CTAGX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.74 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.74 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.057 | -2.862 | -526% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5M | 8.89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 0.06 | 3,535% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.76 | -6.97 | -355% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.47 | 12.34 | 701% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.79 | 7.76 | 616% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement