Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs FSMAX
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$18.01
Change+$0.07 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.09M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.38
Change+$1.40 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. CTAGX (38.1M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: CTAGX (2.02) vs FSMAX (0.43). CTAGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTAGX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.07 vs. FSMAX (3.33). FSMAX (33.03) and CTAGX (32.06) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CTAGX | FSMAX | CTAGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.04 | 3,857% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.04 | 5,171% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.662 | 11.125 | 186% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.1M | 41B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.43 | 468% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.07 | 3.33 | 302% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.23 | 51.85 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.06 | 33.03 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.82 | - |