Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs FSMAX
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$17.71
Change-$0.07 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.75M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.71
Change-$0.26 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. CTAGX (38.8M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: CTAGX (2.02) vs FSMAX (0.43). CTAGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTAGX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.06 vs. FSMAX (10.55). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.24 vs. CTAGX (15.84).
| CTAGX | FSMAX | CTAGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.04 | 3,857% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.04 | 5,171% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.581 | 13.303 | 147% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.8M | 41B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.43 | 468% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.06 | 10.55 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.16 | 67.63 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.84 | 26.24 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 118.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement