CSWYF
Price
$1.00
Change
+$0.07 (+7.53%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
795.89M
VRBCF
Price
$346.00
Change
+$22.00 (+6.79%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSWYF vs VRBCF

Header iconCSWYF vs VRBCF Comparison
Open Charts CSWYF vs VRBCFBanner chart's image
China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group
Price$1.00
Change+$0.07 (+7.53%)
Volume$200
Capitalization795.89M
Virbac SA
Price$346.00
Change+$22.00 (+6.79%)
Volume$23
Capitalization3.24B
CSWYF vs VRBCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
VRBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWYF vs. VRBCF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWYF is a Buy and VRBCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CSWYF: $1.00 vs. VRBCF: $346.00)
Brand notoriety: CSWYF and VRBCF are both not notable
CSWYF represents the Pharmaceuticals: Generic, while VRBCF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWYF: 100% vs. VRBCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CSWYF: $795.89M vs. VRBCF: $3.24B
CSWYF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $795.89M. VRBCF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $3.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $68.3B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $628.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $87.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVRBCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VRBCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSWYF is a better buy in the long-term than VRBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VRBCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • VRBCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

CSWYF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VRBCF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +68.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +80.82%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+6.26% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (+2.35% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRBCF($3.24B) has a higher market cap than CSWYF($796M). VRBCF has higher P/E ratio than CSWYF: VRBCF (17.04) vs CSWYF (4.88). VRBCF YTD gains are higher at: 1.996 vs. CSWYF (0.000).
CSWYFVRBCFCSWYF / VRBCF
Capitalization796M3.24B25%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0001.996-
P/E Ratio4.8817.0429%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VRBCF: Fundamental Ratings
VRBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWYFVRBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VRBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRKAX7.450.01
+0.13%
PGIM Real Estate Income A
GCPCX20.55-0.05
-0.24%
Gateway Equity Call Premium C
ACSYX31.03-0.08
-0.26%
Invesco Comstock C
FSCRX24.75-0.18
-0.72%
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery
FRBAX28.95-0.48
-1.63%
JHancock Regional Bank A

CSWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSWYF and SCLX have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSWYF and SCLX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWYF
1D Price
Change %
CSWYF100%
N/A
SCLX - CSWYF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.09%
SNYNF - CSWYF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
MIRA - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
LYPHF - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JCRRF - CSWYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VRBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRBCF and SCLX have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRBCF and SCLX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRBCF
1D Price
Change %
VRBCF100%
N/A
SCLX - VRBCF
9%
Poorly correlated
+4.09%
MIRA - VRBCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
CSWYF - VRBCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JCRRF - VRBCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNYNF - VRBCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
More