CSWYF vs LYPHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWYF is a Hold and LYPHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSWYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLYPHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSWYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LYPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CSWYF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LYPHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -4.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.99%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-4.26% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| CSWYF | LYPHF | CSWYF / LYPHF | |
| Capitalization | 519M | 1.76B | 30% |
| EBITDA | 115M | 907M | 13% |
| Gain YTD | 8.505 | -27.744 | -31% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.64 | 19.23 | 50% |
| Revenue | 457M | 5.2B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 643M | 5.51B | 12% |
| Total Debt | 2.93M | 9.49B | 0% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
CSWYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSWYF and SCLX have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSWYF and SCLX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSWYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSWYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SCLX - CSWYF | 7% Poorly correlated | -8.11% | ||
| SNYNF - CSWYF | 2% Poorly correlated | -4.17% | ||
| MIRA - CSWYF | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.85% | ||
| LYPHF - CSWYF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JCRRF - CSWYF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
LYPHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LYPHF and MRK have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LYPHF and MRK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LYPHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYPHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MRK - LYPHF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| OGN - LYPHF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
| SNYNF - LYPHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -4.17% | ||
| SCLX - LYPHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -8.11% | ||
| CSWYF - LYPHF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||