CSWC
Price
$21.82
Change
+$0.55 (+2.59%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.23B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAR
Price
$22.45
Change
-$0.13 (-0.58%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
375.22M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSWC vs SAR

Header iconCSWC vs SAR Comparison
Open Charts CSWC vs SARBanner chart's image
Capital Southwest
Price$21.82
Change+$0.55 (+2.59%)
Volume$6.36K
Capitalization1.23B
SARATOGA INVESTMENT
Price$22.45
Change-$0.13 (-0.58%)
Volume$872
Capitalization375.22M
CSWC vs SAR Comparison Chart in %
CSWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWC vs. SAR commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWC is a StrongBuy and SAR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CSWC: $21.26 vs. SAR: $22.60)
Brand notoriety: CSWC and SAR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWC: 41% vs. SAR: 56%
Market capitalization -- CSWC: $1.23B vs. SAR: $375.22M
CSWC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.23B. SAR’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $375.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $161.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSWC is a better buy in the long-term than SAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSWC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSWC is a better buy in the short-term than SAR.

Price Growth

CSWC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.86% price change this week, while SAR (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSWC is expected to report earnings on Feb 02, 2026.

SAR is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.24% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSWC($1.23B) has a higher market cap than SAR($375M). CSWC has higher P/E ratio than SAR: CSWC (13.38) vs SAR (10.04). CSWC YTD gains are higher at: 7.457 vs. SAR (5.804). SAR has less debt than CSWC: SAR (777M) vs CSWC (926M). CSWC has higher revenues than SAR: CSWC (123M) vs SAR (48.6M).
CSWCSARCSWC / SAR
Capitalization1.23B375M328%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.4575.804128%
P/E Ratio13.3810.04133%
Revenue123M48.6M253%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt926M777M119%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSWC vs SAR: Fundamental Ratings
CSWC
SAR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2114
SMR RATING
1..100
3850
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4888
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAR's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (26) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SAR’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

SAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (21) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SAR’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's SMR Rating (38) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SAR (50) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to SAR’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SAR (55) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to SAR’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAR (88) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWCSAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
34%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCNNX29.67N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Contrarian N
WFILX60.40N/A
N/A
Allspring Index A
OCDDY4.69N/A
N/A
Ocado Group PLC
IGPTF9.00N/A
N/A
IG Port Inc.
SGPTF0.18N/A
N/A
SAGE POTASH CORP

CSWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSWC has been closely correlated with GSBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSWC jumps, then GSBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWC
1D Price
Change %
CSWC100%
-0.63%
GSBD - CSWC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
MFIC - CSWC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
GBDC - CSWC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
BCSF - CSWC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
HTGC - CSWC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
More

SAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAR has been loosely correlated with CSWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAR jumps, then CSWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAR
1D Price
Change %
SAR100%
-3.00%
CSWC - SAR
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
PFLT - SAR
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
SLRC - SAR
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
MAIN - SAR
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
ARCC - SAR
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More