Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RWMHX
CSVZX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RWMHX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst
Price$40.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.58B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.64
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
CSVZX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RWMHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. CSVZX (2.58B). CSVZX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: CSVZX (1.61) vs RWMHX (1.33). CSVZX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: CSVZX (15 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). CSVZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX (29.00) and CSVZX (28.00) have comparable annual turnover. RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RWMHX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.07 vs. RWMHX (3.99). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 73.13 vs. RWMHX (49.64).
| CSVZX | RWMHX | CSVZX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.41 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.41 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.915 | 9.663 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.58B | 206B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 1.33 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.07 | 3.99 | 302% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.02 | 41.40 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.13 | 49.64 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.55 | N/A | - |