Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RWMHX
CSVZX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RWMHX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst
Price$41.74
Change-$0.61 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.64B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.73
Change-$0.95 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
CSVZX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. CSVZX (2.64B). CSVZX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: CSVZX (1.58) vs RWMHX (1.33). CSVZX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: CSVZX (15 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). CSVZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX (29.00) and CSVZX (28.00) have comparable annual turnover. RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RWMHX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.20 vs. RWMHX (3.83). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 66.62 vs. RWMHX (44.77).
| CSVZX | RWMHX | CSVZX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.41 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.41 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.219 | 9.812 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.64B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.33 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | 3.83 | 371% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.60 | 31.41 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.62 | 44.77 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers