Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RWEBX
CSVZX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RWEBX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst
Price$42.48
Change+$0.16 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.93B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.10
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
CSVZX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. CSVZX (2.93B). CSVZX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: CSVZX (1.49) vs RWEBX (0.79). CSVZX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: CSVZX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CSVZX (0.82). RWEBX (29.00) and CSVZX (28.00) have comparable annual turnover. RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RWEBX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.18 vs. RWEBX (9.12). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 63.03 vs. RWEBX (35.86).
| CSVZX | RWEBX | CSVZX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.06 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.06 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.762 | 2.132 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 0.79 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.18 | 9.12 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.57 | 28.67 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.03 | 35.86 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.74 | 95.32 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers