Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVFX vs HFQRX
CSVFX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CSVFX vs HFQRX
Columbia International Div Inc Inst
Price$22.16
Change+$0.11 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets578.57M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.06
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
CSVFX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVFX vs. HFQRX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVFX is a Buy and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.62B vs. CSVFX (579M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CSVFX: HFQRX (7.21) vs CSVFX (2.27). CSVFX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CSVFX (25 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CSVFX (1.05) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CSVFX (39.00). CSVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: CSVFX (2000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.38 vs. CSVFX (6.66). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 76.78 vs. CSVFX (45.51).
| CSVFX | HFQRX | CSVFX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.70 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.70 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.608 | 21.813 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 6.62B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 7.21 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 16.38 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.16 | 67.71 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.51 | 76.78 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers